top of page

Hong Kong Intelligence Report #97 世界歷史上的瘟疫暴動和動態清零政策

Open-source intelligence (OSINT)

FILE PHOTO: Victims © Envato

IMPORTANT 【重要】


被出賣的公共衛生:全中國在暴疫中被迫改採「與病毒共存」,病毒和資本最高興!

Betrayed Public Health: All of China Forced to "Live with the Virus" in the Midst of Outbreak, Virus and Capital Reign Supreme!


1. 李家超在2023年1月5日的中港免檢疫通關措施發表會時承認了2022年7月上任以來一直著手走上名為‘復常’的「與病毒共存」的路線。中港免檢疫通關的重點是中港兩地要求通關前48小時做核酸檢測,取得陰性結果才可過關,因此,它還不算按字般的全免檢疫。這還算是在中港澳的疫情嚴峻下唯一屬於正面的一點。LINK

At the January 5, 2023, Hong Kong-China quarantine-free clearance announcement, John Lee Ka-chiu admitted that he had been working on the "WITH-COVID" route called "normalcy" since he took office in July 2022. The point of the quarantine-free clearance is that China and Hong Kong require nucleic acid testing 48 hours prior to clearance, and negative results are required for clearance, so it is not quite a full quarantine exemption. This is the only positive point given the seriousness of the epidemic in Hong Kong and mainland.


2. 白紙疫情暴動和中港反清零國策運動後面有什麼勢力?它們是否政治獨立自主的民眾抗議?這證據是2022年12月28日港府斷送絕大部分防疫措施(除口罩令和確診隔離令等外)後,包括親中國家北韓在內的所謂‘國際社會’紛紛表態實施針對疫情大爆發以及隱瞞和低估疫情實況的中港澳旅客的無感染證明,檢測,甚至封鎖等緊急措施時,內地白紙自由戰士們都至今沒有同樣抗議。他們針對中共或‘國際社會’之間確實都有政治雙重標準。因此,足認被想要改變內地防疫政策的內外資本(反中共勢力)選為白紙疫情暴動原型和模式的敵對矛盾是過去屢次爆發工運/暴動的台灣藍營鴻海科技集團的著名富士康抗議事件。譬如,2010年深圳富士康跳樓事件;2012年鄭州罷工事件;2015年中華全國總工會事件;2022年河南鄭州富士康疫情與衝突等。人民內部矛盾,已顯現的敵對矛盾(民怨)被內外資本勢力剝削了。這就是所謂‘外因透過內因起作用’的典型例子。與黑死病大流行時代的疫情暴動與新冠肺炎下的疫情暴動有所不同。後者則是政治化的,高度政治操縱的作品。


What are the forces behind the A4 White Paper riots and the anti-ZERO-COVID campaign in Hong Kong and China? Were they independent political civil disobedience? This is evidenced by the fact that after the Hong Kong government cut off most of the epidemic prevention measures on December 28, 2022 (except for the mask order and the quarantine order), the so-called 'international community', including the pro-China country of North Korea, took a stand to implement no infection certificates, tests, and even blockades against the epidemic outbreak and the Chinese, Hong Kong, and Macau where concealed and underestimated the actual situation of the epidemic. When the Mainland white paper freedom- fighters have not protested the same emergency measures. There is indeed a political double standard between them and the Chinese Communist Party or the 'international community'. Therefore, it is sufficient to say that the antagonistic contradiction chosen as the prototype and model of the white paper riots by the internal and external capital (anti-Communist forces) who want to change the policy of epidemic prevention in the Mainland is the famous Foxconn protests of the blue-camp Hung Hai Technology Group (Taiwan), which have erupted repeatedly in the past in mainland. For example, the 2010 Foxconn jumping incident in Shenzhen; the 2012 Zhengzhou strike; the 2015 All China Federation of Trade Unions incident; and the 2022 Foxconn epidemic and clashes in Zhengzhou, Henan Province. The internal contradictions of the people, the apparent hostility (public grievances) have been exploited by the internal and external capital forces. This is a typical example of the so-called 'external causes acting through internal causes'. This is different from the epidemic riots during the Black Death pandemic and the epidemic riots under the SARS-COV2. The latter was a politicized and highly politically manipulated work.


3. 瘟疫暴動(plague riot)是個國安術語。不過,香港市民不難看出目前所謂國安單位的重大缺點之一是其國安定義過於狹窄。簡言之,在執行上,國安概念的內涵和外延為除了「5獨」(分裂主義/分離主義)以外都不是個國家安全問題。這就是為什麼全中國的所謂國安單位都並沒有阻止代表內外資本勢力的港府(行政長官會議 LINK),香港總商會(港府政策幾乎聽從兼任行政長官會議成員的香港總商會立法會代表林健鋒 LINK),衛生官僚,政府疫情顧問以及媒體等上層集團從香港率先推動「與病毒共存」路線來最終斷送動態清零國策。這證實了香港仍然是個滲透和破壞國家政策的前進基地。


香港/中國政治有一個規律,即內外部資本/反共反華勢力的圖謀/傾向總是率先從香港展現的。

袖手旁觀,當國家的防疫政策被反共勢力瞄準和遭受裏外攻破而犧牲公共衛生和人民生命的時候,所謂國安單位毫無舉措以及無法阻止。疫情及防疫不在國安定義範疇,因此國安法和未來23條立法都不會阻止未來瘟疫大流行時會肯定重演的資本的政治圖謀。


Plague riot is a national security term. However, it is easy for Hong Kong people to see that one of the major shortcomings of the current so-called national security units is that their definition of national security is too narrow. In short, in terms of implementation, the concept of national security is not a national security issue except for the "5 Independencies" (separatism). This is why the so-called national security units across China have not stopped the upper echelons of the Hong Kong government (Chief Executive's Council), the Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce (HKGCC) (HKGCC's Legislative Council representative Jeffrey Lam, who is also a member of the Chief Executive's Council), health bureaucrats, government epidemic advisors, and the media from taking the lead in promoting the "co-existence with the virus" route in Hong Kong to eventually give away the dynamic zero-COVID state policy. This confirms that Hong Kong remains a forward base for infiltrating and undermining state policy.


There is a law in Hong Kong or entire Chinese politics that the political designs/tendencies of internal and external anti-communist and anti-Chinese forces are always first to manifest from Hong Kong.


When the national epidemic prevention policy was targeted by anti-communist forces and attacked from inside and outside at the expense of public health and people's lives, the so-called national security units did nothing and could not stop it. Epidemics and epidemic prevention are not part of national security, so neither the national security law nor the future Article 23 legislation will stop the political machinations of capital that will surely be repeated in future pandemics.


4. 在實際上,對西方情報單位而言,特定政治議題反而成了輿論工具。即不僅是所謂‘分裂主義’,‘顏色革命’云云都原來屬於反帝國主義的敘事如今成了操縱輿論和動員炮灰的敘事了。這些說故事的工具都是為了從真正政治過程轉移焦點的‘愛國騷’。雙方都從這個容易撈取各自政治資本,同時可以隱瞞真正進行的政治作戰。此次,中國正確的國策,動態清零被強迫推翻掉的整個過程(2022年9月24日-)充分證實了這點。(雖在反修例風波上,資本和國策相抵觸的真政治以及上演顏色政治的愛國騷此兩大政治層面重疊,但反修例風波原來是出於本港內外資本對於被移交給內地審判的商業罪行的恐懼)


簡言之,逃犯條例修訂案和防疫措施(合乎公共利益的政策)都淪為了資本的敵人。那麼,對這兩大運動/作戰背後的資本而言,逃稅和病毒本身都不是問題了。在政治上,資本總是如此顛倒是非黑白,扭曲傳統人類價值觀。如不免疫的疫苗?新冠乃普通感冒/流感?

結局都在愛國騷矇騙眾人之下遭受逐步搞出的猛烈打擊而最終消滅。所謂愛國騷的最新例子是,2023年1月5日有報導指港府控制的港交所終於將在2023年1月12日除去(在2021年12月15日已‘被結業’的)壹傳媒的上市資格(除牌 LINK)。它早就倒閉了。現在才除牌,這十分離譜的。為什麼是在中國被迫免檢疫通關的1月8日前夕才發布這個?誠然,此舉是在民生上面,毫無實際意義和影響,是純屬愛國騷/愛國秀。愛國秀是從真正政治過程轉移焦點以及穩賺政治資本,政治保護和政治信賴的公關。因此,香港市民反對和批判港府和資本,千萬不要被內外資本勢力當作愛國騷所需的小丑和炮灰(過去的所謂民主派,包括資本的造神運動大量製造的所謂網紅及社運明星)。要的是如顧汝德或本土研究社那樣的‘具體問題的具體研究’,以免掉入愛國騷/顏色政治的敘事框架內。那麼,究竟誰在操縱這個敘事框架?就是壟斷媒體和公共資訊領域的內外資本雙方勢力。這才是反修例風波的教訓。同時,這也絕不意味著反對者需要淪為所謂‘忠誠的反對派’此一另類垃圾。


資本是個人利益,而非公共利益。資本也是社會問題的根源。所有的社會問題歸根結底是直接或間接的資本運動的產物。在階級社會,第一個社會問題正是「人剝削人」。

In practice, for Western intelligence agencies, specific political issues have become tools of public opinion. That is, not only so-called 'separatism' but also 'color revolutions' and the like have become narratives that manipulate public opinion and mobilize cannon fodder. These storytelling tools are all 'patriotic shows' to shift the focus from the real political process. Both sides are making easy political gains out of this, while hiding the real political warfare going on. This is amply demonstrated by the fact that China's correct national policy, Dynamic Zero, was forcibly overturned throughout the process (September 24, 2022-January 8, 2023). (While the two major political dimensions of the anti-extradition law amendment bill controversy overlap between the real politics of capital and state policy contradiction and the patriotic shows of color politics, the anti-extradition law amendment bill controversy turns out to be the fear of capital, both inside and outside Hong Kong, of being handed over to the Mainland for trial for commercial crimes.)


Both the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance amendment and the anti-epidemic measures (a policy in the public interest) have become the enemies of capital. So, for the capital behind these two hostile movements, tax evasion and the virus itself are no longer issues. In politics, capital has always been such a perversion of right and wrong and a distortion of traditional human values. Like a vaccine that does not immunize? The new coronavirus infection is the common cold / flu?


Both ended up suffering from the fierce criticism and eventual demise of the patriotic shows that fooled the masses. The latest example of the so-called patriotic show is that on January 5, 2023, it was reported that the Hong Kong government-controlled HKEx would finally remove the listing status (delisting) of Next Digital (which 'wound up' on December 15, 2021) on January 12, 2023. It has long since closed down. It is only now that the license was removed, which is very outrageous. Why is this released on the eve of January 8, when China was forced to harshly resume quarantine-free customs clearance? Admittedly, this move is on top of the people's livelihood, has no real meaning or impact, it is purely a patriotic show. Patriotic show is a public relations to shift the focus from the real political process and to earn political gains, political protection and political trust. Therefore, Hong Kong people should oppose and criticize the Hong Kong government and capital, and should not be treated as clowns and cannon fodder for patriotic shows by internal and external capitalist forces (the so-called democrats in the past, including the so-called net stars and social movement stars created by the capitalist god-making movement in large numbers). What is needed is a 'specific study of specific issues' like Leo Goodstadt or the Liber Research Community , so as not to fall into the framework of the narrative of the patriotic shows /color politics. Thus, who is manipulating this narrative framework? It is the internal and external capitalist forces that monopolize the media and public information sphere. This is the lesson of the anti-extradition law amendment bill controversy. At the same time, it does not in any way mean that the opponents need to be reduced to the alternative garbage of the so-called 'loyal opposition'.


Capital is a personal interest, not a public interest. Capital is also a source of social problems. All social problems are ultimately the product of direct or indirect capital movements. In a class society, the first social problem is the "exploitation of man by man".


5. 有些清零派網紅只顧輝瑞。但是埋葬國策(動態清零)的推手/獲利者仍有復必泰(德國復必泰意味著德國政府和輝瑞)以及莫德納(香港設有辦公室並已獲准銷售新冠口服藥莫納皮拉韋(Molnupiravir)LINK)。不過,輝瑞是中俄兩國議題上都扮演了重大角色。一個是輝瑞參與的烏克蘭的美國國防部生化‘防疫’研究所項目 Some of the pro-ZERO-COVID netizens only care about Pfizer. But the promoters/profiteers of the burial of the national policy (dynamic zero) are still BioNTech(BioNTech means the German government and Pfizer) and Moderna (which has an office in Hong Kong and is authorized to sell the new oral drug Molnupiravir since 2022). However, Pfizer is a major player in both Russian and Chinese issues. One is Pfizer's participation in the U.S. Department of Defense's Biochemical 'Disease Prevention' Institute project in Ukraine;


"Among them are former director of Defense Threat Reduction Agency Kenneth Myers, executive vice president of the CIA-controlled In-Q-Tel venture fund Tara O'Toole, former head of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Thomas Frieden, former director of the National Institutes of Health Francis Collins, former CEO of the Battelle Memorial Institute Jeffrey Wadsworth, chief researcher and president of the Department of International Research, Development and Medicine of Pfizer, and many others," Kirillov revealed.

LINK


另一個是實現全中國「與病毒共存」的社會狀態。輝瑞的新冠口服藥Paxlovid 已經有中港兩地的本地市場了。只剩下,內地疫苗市場全面開放而已。為何港府在2022年12月28日宣布廢掉了疫苗通行證?是因為輝瑞和復必泰實現了全中國「與病毒共存」狀態及1月8日起免檢疫通關。


只要有「與病毒共存」的社會狀態以及疫情持續,疫苗生機就是無窮盡的。新冠病毒的防疫降級(中國官方昨晚宣布明年1月8日將COVID-19降為「乙類乙管」並取消入境集中隔離 LINK)只會服務這個過程的。真正結束疫情暴利的方式是真正結束疫情,而非與病毒共存。

The other is the realization of a "WITH-COVID" society across China. Pfizer's COVID oral drug Paxlovid already has a local market in Hong Kong and China. All that remains is for the Mainland vaccine market to be fully opened up. Why did the Hong Kong government announce on December 28, 2022 that it was abolishing the Vaccine Pass? It is because Pfizer and BioNTech have achieved "co-existing with virus" status in China, and borders will have been exempted from quarantine clearance since January 8.


As long as there is a social state of "coexistence with the virus" and the epidemic continues, the vaccine business opportunities are endless. The downgrading of the new coronavirus (China announced that COVID-19 will be downgraded to "Category B" and the centralized quarantine of entry will be lifted on January 8) will only serve this process. The real way to end the epidemic boom is to actually end the epidemic, not to live with the virus.


在2022年12月31日港府低調發布了具有非常重要意義的通知(向內地人士銷售西方輝瑞和莫德納的新冠口服藥) On December 31, 2022, the Hong Kong government made a low-key announcement of great importance(Sales of Pfizer and Moderna's COVID oral drugs to Mainlanders):


政府發言人今日(十二月三十一日)表示,因應政府早前宣布調整本地防疫抗疫措施,衞生署已發信通知登記使用醫健通的私家醫生,提醒他們如向「非符合資格人士」處方由政府提供的兩款新冠口服抗病毒藥物帕克斯洛維德(Paxlovid)和莫納皮拉韋(Molnupiravir),需代爲向病人收取有關藥物的費用。


政府早前宣布,爲確保資源有效運用及提升應對能力,會優先為「符合資格人士」確診者提供醫療服務及政府採購的藥物。由於私營醫療機構可直接向有關藥廠訂購兩款新冠口服藥物,「非符合資格人士」的新冠確診病人應直接在私營醫療機構獲取治療及處方有關藥物。如私家醫院和診所向「非符合資格人士」處方透過衞生署及醫院管理局(醫管局)分配的新冠口服藥物,需按機制代政府向病人收取指明定數額的藥物費用,每個療程劑量超過六千元。   同時,政府再次呼籲私家醫院和診所為新冠確診病人提供醫療服務,減輕公共醫療系統負荷。現時在醫健通的系統上,有634名私家醫生登記透過衞生署分配新冠口服藥物。「符合資格人士」確診後,如有需要可透過私家醫生處方由政府提供的新冠口服藥物,不需就藥物繳付任何費用。   發言人強調,公共醫療系統就新冠病人需要的藥物備存量充足,政府會確保有充足醫療資源應付本地需要。衞生署及醫管局會繼續加大採購量並會理順派藥安排,並密切監察透過私家醫生向病人處方口服藥物的情況。

LINK


在整個反清零運動的本質是西方疫苗公司的利潤和業務擴大。其終極目標是從香港著手逐漸全面打開內地疫苗市場。香港在2023年1月8日起全面免檢疫通關仍然只是其環節。但後來在‘國際社會’紛紛重啟對華防疫措施之際,中央政府拒絕了歐盟免費提供西方疫苗的政治舉措 The essence of the entire anti-ZERO-COVID campaign is the expansion of profits and business of Western vaccine companies. The ultimate goal is to gradually open up the full Mainland vaccine market, starting with Hong Kong. Hong Kong's full quarantine-free customs clearance from January 8, 2023 is still only part of the equation. But then the central government rejected the EU's political move to provide free Western vaccines at a time when the 'international community' is resuming measures against China:


2023年1月4日報導指 January 4, 2023 reported as:


在北京,外交部對試圖操弄疫情防控措施以達到政治目的的做法,表示堅決反對。發言人又回應歐盟提出向中國捐贈疫苗,指中國的醫療物資總體供應充足,疫苗能夠滿足「應接盡接」的需要。

LINK


誠然,歐盟免費提供西方疫苗(當然是復必泰=輝瑞疫苗;美國拜登提議的則是莫德納)是為了順利全面打開內地疫苗市場。中央政府明白其政治意圖,而拒絕了。目前,就中港免檢疫通關以及內地疫苗市場兩大事宜而言,前者仍要求48小時內核酸檢測;後者明確拒絕了政治化的,有目的的免費西方疫苗援助。


Admittedly, the EU's offer of free Western vaccines (BioNTech = Pfizer, of course; Biden's offer was Moderna) was intended to smoothly and fully open the Mainland vaccine market. The central government understood its political intention and refused. At present, on the two major issues of quarantine-free customs clearance and the Mainland vaccine market, the former still requires nucleic acid testing within 48 hours; the latter explicitly rejects the politicized, purposeful free Western vaccine aid.


以下就是整個反清零運動的核心(為西方疫苗公司全面打開內地市場)The following is at the core of the entire anti-ZERO-COVID campaign (to fully open the Mainland market for Western vaccine companies):

Beijing has refused to approve any of the western Covid vaccines, instead relying mainly on homegrown jabs made by Sinovac and Sinopharm, which are both approved by the World Health Organization. Experts believe the main Chinese-made vaccines provide high levels of protection from severe illness and death with three doses. But they are less effective and fade faster than the mRNA technology developed by BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna, which are used across the west.

LINK


China faces a difficult situation because its domestically developed vaccines are not as effective as Pfizer’s and Moderna’s mRNA shots. Vaccine coverage among the elderly population in China also lags behind other countries.

“One in seven people on the planet live in China and the acceleration of vaccination, the protection of the health system during this period, is in the interest of seven out of seven people on this planet, Ryan said.

The U.S. has offered China mRNA Covid vaccines and other support but Beijing has declined the offer, the federal health official said on Wednesday’s call.

LINK


除了改採「與病毒共存」以外,中國還沒全面投降。就中醫方面,也仍然大力維護和推廣 Except for the change to "living with the virus", China has not yet surrendered completely. As far as Chinese medicine is concerned, it is still being vigorously defended and promoted:


國家藥監局周二(3日)亦發布通知,要求加強對中藥飲片、中藥配方顆粒監管。其中包括加強中藥材品質管理,優化醫療機構中藥製劑管理,完善中藥審評審批機制,重視中藥上市後管理,提升中藥標準管理水平,加大中藥安全監管力度,推進中藥監管全球化合作等。

LINK


內外資本衝破的第一道防線是「動態清零」國策(2022年9月24日港府張竹君公然主張「與病毒共存」- 12月8日中央政府「突然放開」);第二道防線是「內地疫苗市場不開放給西方疫苗」;第三道防線則是整個「中醫產業」(中國5千年的文化)。

目前,內外部勢力聯合在中港澳正在試圖衝破的是第二道防線。其實,最後面臨重大存亡危機的是整個中醫產業。國安單位到底在做什麼呢?中國正在面臨的就是21世紀版鴉片戰爭。疫情也尚未結束,此一政治攻堅戰也尚未抵達其最終目標。


6. 雖早在第5波第一階段(2021年12月至2022年5月)港府逐漸轉為「與病毒共存」的躺平路線。在2022年9月26日以來,港府,內外資本勢力,疫情政府顧問,社團/有限公司公關人物及媒體等最積極聯合起來成功拆除了絕大部分防疫措施,減除監測數次和全中國的動態清零政策後,但有些疫情數據仍有效顯示每日實際疫情惡化的程度。


最重要的數據是,港媒普遍一律不報導的現有個案(active case)數據。

還有單日死亡人數,急症醫院內科病床住用率以及公共醫院輪候等候時間。這些都顯示疫情嚴峻的程度。如李家超自稱,本港疫情已經克服了嗎?疫情已受控?(‘已克服疫情障礙’ LINK


The first line of defense that has been breached by internal and external capital is the national policy of "dynamic zero" (on September 24, 2022, Chuang Shuk Kwan of the Hong Kong government openly advocated "coexistence with the virus" - on December 8, the central government "suddenly opened up"); the second line of defense is "not opening up the Mainland vaccine market to Western vaccines"; and the third line of defense is the entire "Chinese medicine industry" (5,000 years of Chinese culture).


At present, the second line of defense is being attempted by the combination of internal and external capitalist forces in Hong Kong and mainland China. In fact, it is the entire Chinese medicine industry that is facing a major crisis of survival. What exactly are the national security units doing? What China is facing is the 21st century version of the Opium War. The epidemic is not over yet, and this political war of attrition has not yet reached its ultimate goal.


Although as early as the first phase of Wave 5 (December 2021 to May 2022) the Hong Kong government gradually shifted to a "live with the virus" approach. Since September 26, 2022, the Hong Kong government, internal and external capital forces, government advisors on the epidemic, public relations figures from associations/limited companies, and the media have been most active in successfully dismantling most of the epidemic prevention measures, reduced mass surveillance several times and after a dynamic zero policy ruined across China, but some of the epidemic data still effectively show the actual daily extent of the worsening of the epidemic.


Most importantly, there are active case data that are generally not reported by the Hong Kong media.


There is also the number of deaths per day, the occupancy rate of medical beds in acute hospitalisation, and the waiting time in public hospitals. These are all indicators of the severity of the epidemic. As John Lee Ka-chiu claims, has the epidemic been overcome in Hong Kong? Is the epidemic under control?


NEWS 【事實關係】


我們應回顧,港府為炒股逐漸拆除防疫措施的時間表(放寬措施日期;疫情數據;恆生指數;入境人數):


港府的政策特色之一是政策金融化。總是把碎步式放寬政策當作股市槓桿。就免檢疫通關而言,把逐步放開出入境人數的舉措是股市槓桿。每一次發放放寬/開放的消息成為炒股槓桿。不管標榜是什麼顏色陣營,香港媒體都是其‘夥伴’。 這主要是美國和港府的深層合作。

一邊放棄防疫措施,一邊炒股,炒到如今21000點了。(2023年1月3日終於破了2萬點)


為此資本目的犧牲的則是疫情及其每日死難者。資本至上,利潤至上。


2020年1月23日 本港疫情首宗確診個案。

2020年1月24日 香港市民:102663;內地入境客:36705;其他旅客:22872;總計162240 出入境的最多的總是香港市民。

現有個案:60宗


2022年9月1日 香港市民:5328;內地入境客:358;其他旅客:34;總計5720


2022年9月24日 港府張竹君公然否定動態清零政策,而主張「與病毒共存」。衞生署衞生防護中心傳染病處主任張竹君:香港至今每日仍有數千宗確診,相信較難清零,認為除非全球也沒有個案,估計新冠病毒仍會與人類共存。

LINK


2022年9月26日 港府撤掉了入境隔離期,此後「外防輸入」此一環節瓦解。


香港今(26日)早起放寬入境限制到只需家居自我檢測三天,但期間不能到食肆和酒吧等需要接種疫苗後才進入的地方。不過,新措施似有「內外不討好」之勢,酒店業和飲食業界指新措施對境外旅客吸引力不大,但卻令近三年受防疫措施所限而難以外游的港人急於離港,影響本地消費,促全面放寬。香港美國商會總裁翁以登亦直言,新措施難以吸引商務旅客,競爭力不足,促港府解除所有入境防疫限制,與國際接軌,復興經濟。

LINK


現有個案:291284宗

恆生指數為17855.14


疫情越嚴峻越放寬的反知性主義(反智主義)政策的正式開始。


2022年10月6日 港府進一步放寬防疫措施。如食肆每枱人數由8增至12;表列處所如派對房間及卡拉OK等,每組人數由8增至12;酒吧或酒館、夜店或夜總會每枱人數由4增至6(快測要求維持不變);宴會人數由120增至240(快測要求維持不變);取消郵輪公海遊熔斷機制等。 LINK


現有個案:246846宗

恆生指數為18012.15


2022年10月20日


政府今日(十月十八日)公布,行政長官會同行政會議已經批准對《預防及控制疾病(禁止聚集)規例》(第599G章)作出修訂,把在公眾地方進行的羣組聚集的人數上限由四人增加至12人。有關修訂將會按「先訂立、後審議」程序由立法會審議,並於十月二十日起生效,以配合早前政府公布將作適度放寬的社交距離措施生效周期(即十月二十日至十一月二日)。

LINK


香港市民:8463;內地入境客:1427;其他旅客:1172;總計11062


港府應美國總商會AMCHAM(The American Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong)的要求撤掉入境隔離日期後,終於破了入境人數1萬大關。


現有個案:184002宗

恆生指數為16280.22