Hong Kong Intelligence Report #32 Masterminds of Hong Kong Colour Revolutions: HK Ruling Class & US
Updated: Aug 1, 2021
#HongKong #IntelligenceReport #香港情報分析 #OSINT
IMPORTANT
Looking at the political ecology of the ruling class in Hong Kong behind the color politics that tears the society into permanent turmoil,
Is the color of the ruling class in Hong Kong blue or yellow? Its political characteristic is two-faced.
In fact, the business community in Hong Kong has served as an intelligence, politics, education, censorship and administrative agency, compradors of external forces, and they have continued to infiltrate and expand the network of organized pressure groups/advocacy groups to resist the influence of the central government both politically and economically since 1997. The political parties and politicians of different colors are just funded by the same business community of Hong Kong. They are only political chess pieces, the real capitalist ruling classes behind them are actually playing the entire chess game.
The black-shirted anti-extradition bill rioters and the opposition camp are just the infantry unit of their business masterminds; the so called ‘‘pro-establishment’’ camp is the bastion of the same business masterminds.
Behind the scenes of the ‘‘pro-Beijing’’ PR stunt, politics of the capitalist class in Hong Kong, such as VISION 2047 Foundation, the Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce, and in particular Victor Fung and others are all based on the establishment system as a protective umbrella ‘Aegis’. As they continue to block and weaken the influence of the central government on their vested interests of colonial Hong Kong and Britain, they need intermittently staging a color revolution, and at the same time they also need to scapegoat the black-shirted anti-extradition bill rioters and the opposition camp which created by themselves for highly political PR stunt of ‘‘patriotism and love for Hong Kong’’. Therefore, the political turmoil in Hong Kong has no tendency to stop in the upcoming future. New color revolutions will only come one after another.
The brainwashing liberal education system that promoted Occupy Central, Mongkok riot, the anti-extradition bill riots was jointly created by the US and the so called ‘‘pro-establishment’’ business community through the establishment. In short, the masterminds who go hand in hand with the US to co-create color rioters are nothing more than the business community in Hong Kong.
Suggestion: Don't just watch the blue and yellow camps of the Hong Kong political theatre, but we should more carefully look at how the Hong Kong ruling class who behind them uses both blue and yellow camps to make the political and economic plots of capital succeeded. This is the real and only political color of the masterminds behind colour-divided politics. Behind the scenes of the internal forces are those who in the capitalist class in Hong Kong who can use blue and yellow camps to do things, and they simultaneously collude with external forces.
The most important thing revealed on the Hong Kong-America Centre scandal is that after the establishment of "Hong Kong Institute Of Service Leadership & Management Limited" in Hong Kong by one of members of ‘‘pro-establishment’’ VISION2047 Foundation, co-founder of DHL International (Asia Pacific), and currently Chairman Emeritus of DHL Express (Hong Kong) Limited, CHUNG Po Yang in November 2011, in January 2012, CHUNG Po Yang’s Hong Kong Institute of Service Leadership and Management ltd. and other Vision 2047 member, Victor Fung, who is the chairman of the Fung Group, announced "Victor And William Fung Foundation" via which they funded $40 million to set up a Li & Fung Service Leader Plan at eight universities in Hong Kong in order to further promote US State Department-backed liberal studies.
This means that this ‘‘pro-establishment’’ Victor Fung is not only an unofficial member of the Hong Kong Chief Executive’s Council of Advisers on Innovation and Strategic Development
Advisory Panel, an advisor to the Hong Kong Monetary Authority’s Infrastructure Financing Facilitation Office, an academician of Academy of Finance and the chairman of Civil Service Training Advisory Board, ex-member of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (-2018?), ‘‘pro-establishment’’, an American, a member of ‘‘pro-establishment’’ Vision 2047 Foundation, his Li & Fung Limited is the earliest member of ‘‘pro-establishment’’ the Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce (The Chamber's Oldest Members), the deputy chairman of the ‘‘pro-establishment’’ Our Hong Kong Foundation, co-sponsor of the newly established ‘‘pro-establishment’’ Hong Kong Coalition is also cooperating with US State Department on Hong Kong politics.
Finally, the one of US State Department’s foreign policy programs, "Fulbright Program" scholars who engaging in brainwashing local students were successfully trained and installed via the Hong Kong Institute Of Service Leadership & Management and the Hong Kong-America Centre. The American "Fulbright Program" scholars they trained were installed into the liberal education system of the eight universities as architects of liberal educational system itself to brainwash students, create colour revolutionary thugs, and cannon fodders for US and local ruling class political agenda.
The end is to bring out colour revolutions like Occupy Central, Mongkok riot, and still ongoing anti-extradition bill riots. The case of Victor Fung, an outstanding person in Hong Kong’s ruling capitalist class, best reflects the political characteristics of Hong Kong’s ruling class and the political ecology of the entire ruling class against central government. At this level, the class nature of the blue-yellow dichotomy is highlighted.
The real political colour played by the ruling class in Hong Kong is that on one side it can automatically divide and manage the masses; on the other side it can automatically camouflage, guide and resist the political judgement about their own political nature by others including both citizens and the central government. Furthermore, they can even exclusively enjoy the advantages of being ‘‘pro-establishment’’.
FACTS
The different political colours, blue and yellow form the disgusting identity politics of Hong Kong. The ruling class divides and manages the working class including the students by this political tool. This political tool ‘colour division’ is not even the class ideology of the working class itself. Even blue and yellow have nothing to do with the class interests of the working class at all. The working class only needs to face up to and be loyal to the class interests of its own class. This is the only benchmark for making correct judgment on political and economic policies under capitalism. The financial patrons of so-called pro-establishment and opposition camps in Hong Kong are roughly the same people, thus there is no essential difference between them.
There are only external differences in means and role functions between ‘‘pro-establishment’’ and opposition camps (although they are all voting devices of the ruling class, but the so-called pro-establishment is good at pure administrative means; The opposition is good at the mass line). Don’t forget that when the opposition parliamentary delegation visited the Mainland China in 2018, they were all very ‘‘pro-establishment’’ and formed into one color. The so-called opposition is not outside of the establishment, but it belongs to the opposition within the system, so the opposition is also part of establishment, otherwise it will not be any news. For example, HK01 reported on April 20, 2018:
32名立法會議員，在政制及內地事務局局長聶德權、創新及科技局局長楊偉雄、財經事務及庫務局局長劉怡翔，以及商務及經濟發展局局長邱騰華的陪同下，今日（4月20日）起連續三天訪問大灣區內五個城市，是繼去年發展事務委員會考察東江水流域後的第二次北上考察活動。是次行程安排，主要以參觀重要基建與創科企業為主，相信有助立法會議員理解灣區內鄰居的發展。當然，除了科技、經濟與規劃上的相互理解外，此次交流或更能增加陸方與民主派的互信，為香港政治發展的主旋律帶來積極變化。......
泛民主派對這次的參觀表現非常積極，同時也是非常務實，值得社會讚許。名義上，這次的「聯席事務委員會訪問團」由經濟發展事務委員會、財經事務委員會、工商事務委員會和資訊科技及廣播事務委員會等四個事務委員會組成，實際上則允許所有議員報名，民主黨黃碧雲和林卓廷、衞生服務界李國麟、教育界葉建源等都是以非委員身份「參團」，令這次活動的泛民議員達九名之多。(1)
When they went to the mainland to investigate economic development of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area as governmental delegative representatives of Hong Kong, they could not be separated from the so-called ‘‘pro-establishment’’ faction. In other words, the general misconception (mostly a formal logical error) is that the opposition is considered to exist outside of the establishment. In fact, the Legislative Council itself is part of establishment. The opposition in the Legislative Council is also part of the system. This is not simply to regard the opposition itself as an example of a political chameleon in accordance with the dichotomy they instil in public, however they are just political pieces for the masterminds, politically two-faced businessmen behind them, the color of their chess pieces can be changed and even faded at any time they want. Yes, as long as they are ordered to do so, namely there is no fundamental difference in color at this level. The point is that for the masters, the masters themselves control the two different colors in order to achieve the political goal in general. There is no color for masters, and those different colors are all the "colors" of the masters.
Therefore, color is not an essential difference in the capitalist political system at all. Color is a tool for controlling the blind masses. Like the color of traffic lights, it only makes sense when the ruling class needs to control the masses. The above-mentioned opposition delegation in the Mainland China highlights the influence of the masters when the opposition is in Hong Kong, the sheer contrast and the apparently different role arrangements of the opposition when they are in the Mainland China (blue and yellow’s business masters are roughly the same people behind them).
Playing a political chess game is the Hong Kong ruling class not those blue or yellow political camps which are just chess pieces of the masters.
In fact, this same political phenomenon is also fully reflected in the process of the establishment of brainwashing liberal educational system for the US imperialists through ‘‘pro-establishment’’ organizational network in Hong Kong. Even this is a process of expanding and reproducing the organizational network of ‘‘pro-establishment’’ pressure groups monopolizing and intensifying Hong Kong’s vested interests while effectively blocking or even skilfully using the influence and interventions from the central government. These are the political characteristics and tendencies of the Hong Kong ruling class which quite different from the mainland.
Hong Kong’s ruling class, including both internal and external forces, is best at being two-faced people, especially while facing the central government.
Hong Kong’s political and economic environment and system are full of two-faced people, especially its ruling class, compradors, the chambers of commerce, and its self-proclaimed ‘‘pro-establishment’’ camp. It is purely imaginable or easy to recognize that there are more two-faced people in ‘‘pro-establishment’’ camp than any recognized opposition camp organizations. External forces infiltrate the central bureaucratic system through the use of so-called ‘‘pro-establishment’’ business chambers, associations, alliances, foundations, political parties, and bureaus because there is no other way. In its nature, their networks are like spider webs, the same member, the same guy crosses different chambers of commerce, associations, alliances to continuously expand the network of lobbying, interest groups, pressure groups, and oligarchs use the CPPCC or NPC members to package and name these pressure groups in order to make them ‘protective umbrellas’ from Beijing. This is how they create ‘‘pro-establishment’’ pressure groups.
However, what is most concealed from the public is that those internal forces that systematically endanger national security are not those external forces who rely on internal forces to succeed.
The external causes become operative through internal causes. The oligarchs of internal and external forces have long colluded and mastered Hong Kong society since 1997. For example, Carrie Lam is just a contact of VISION2047 Foundation, a social combination of internal and external forces, and the similar Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce. There is a undeniable fact that Reuters gained and exposed the deliberately leaked voice record of lunch time secret conversation of Lam with the members of VISION2047 Foundation on September 3, 2019. They use their social identities to engage in humint, and the best quality information is obtained only through contacts within the target system. It was Reuters, a member of the Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce, who obtained and exposed the content. Therefore, the relationships between Carrie Lam-VISION2047-Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce and Reuters finally led to official abandonment of the extradition bill amendment (the amendment that had been castrated by the Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce beforehand) on September 4, 2019. Headline Daily reported on September 4, 2019:
從林鄭的錄音內容，顯示林鄭與Vision 2047會晤時，說話非常坦率，有建制中人對此頗有微言，認為林鄭即使與其他香港商界或建制派人士會晤時，亦沒有如此「盡訴心中情」。雖說特首辦強調有關會晤表明是互不引述原則，但林鄭在官場打滾數十年，若然相信她的說話不會「漏料」，就真的「太天真」了。結果不但漏料，更漏出錄音，就更是匪夷所思。可見出席者中，有人處心積慮要「爆料」，而且還要是「證據確鑿」。(2)
READ MORE:
Behind the establishment and development of the brainwashing liberal educational system of Hong Kong: the US imperialist forces have penetrated the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, the so-called ‘‘pro-establishment’’ chambers of commerce, the so-called ‘‘pro-establishment’’ associations, the so-called ‘‘pro-establishment’’ organization networks, and even the organization network continues to expand to form a mixture of internal and external forces. An integrated ruling class alliance, large pressure groups of vested interests which cooperating with imperial external forces.
VISION 2047, the American national capitalist Victor Fung, who successfully infiltrated the establishment of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, has long promoted the American brainwashing organisational network in Hong Kong at least from 2012. Wen Wei Po reported on April 16, 2020:
【文匯網訊】香港去年「黑暴」成災，多所大學淪為暴徒基地，不少大學生成為外國勢力的棋子。據《大公報》調查發現，由美國駐港領事館主導及撥款資助的中文大學香港美國中心(港美中心)，執行美國國務院教育及文化事務局轄下的「傅爾布萊特計劃」(Fulbright Program)，聲稱推動學術交流，但最新2020年美國國務院文件直指學術交流計劃只是達到國防及外交政策的政治手段。早於香港2012年實施高中及大學「三三四」學制改革的時候，美領館就以協助改革為名，輸入25名「傅爾布萊特學者」來港，由港美中心搭橋，滲透香港八所大學，設計通識教育課程、執教及培訓，變相操控香港高等教育重要課程。......
派遣25美學者滲港八大學
1993年港美中心的創立人Dr. Lee C. Lee，正是傅爾布萊特計劃學者，現任港美中心行政總監夏龍博士亦是傅爾布萊特學者。自1998年起，美領館成員是港美中心董事局當然成員，港美中心顯然是美國在香港學術界的官方工具。前基本法委員會委員劉廼強2014年曾踢爆港美中心包攬八所大學的通識教育課程，用美式思想影響香港高等教育，由駐港美領事館從美國物色學者，加入「傅爾布萊特計劃」(Fulbright Program)，再由香港商人鍾普洋出面捐款港美中心，並動用大學教育資助委員會(教資會)的大學配對補助金計劃，獲港府以捐款等額的撥款資助「傅爾布萊特香港通識教育計劃」(Fulbright Hong Kong General Education Program)。
鍾普洋捐款港美中心
當時鍾普洋對劉廼強的踢爆曾撰文反駁，辯稱沒有壟斷，又指Fulbright列出學者名單供各大學參考，但選擇權在各大學的負責人，又聲稱傅爾布萊特計劃學者沒有參與課程編寫。大公報調查發現，港商鍾普洋是DHL香港區創辦人，2007年捐款予港美中心展開香港通識教育計劃，鍾並以其創意策動基金(Creative Initiatives Foundation)協助推動。
港美中心的公開資料說出真相，八大學負責人對美領館推薦的傅爾布萊特計劃學者照單全收。港美中心網頁列明2006年至2012年共有25名Fulbright學者來港參與香港通識教育計劃。現任港美中心行政總監夏龍在報告指出，美國來港的Fulbright學者在香港八所大學的通識教育，由課程設計、學系發展、新教學法、通識計劃成效、評估方法等多個範疇，與香港學者緊密合作，Fulbright網站還上載相關文件、影片以供參考。報告又列出每一名Fulbright學者在香港各大學的教學、課程設計、老師培訓等經驗分享，二十多名美國傅爾布萊特學者六年來全方位來港滲入香港大學界的通識教育課程，這與捐款人鍾普洋的輕描淡寫有很大落差。
Vision 2047成員列席港美董事局
協助推動大學通識教育計劃的「創意策動基金」，創辦人除了鍾普洋外，還有美國名牌地捫(Del Monte)食品製造商Godfery Scotchbrook。Godfery Scotchbrook是Vision 2047 基金會的基金受託人兼創辦人，成員雲集外籍富商及港英政府前高官包括前財經事務司簡德倫，及陳方安生密友、前社署助理署長簡何巧雲等。去年行政長官林鄭月娥談話的錄音風波，正是在Vision 2047基金午餐會被偷錄外泄。
林鄭談話被偷錄
2012年大學改制三轉四落實推行時，鍾普洋再與另一名Vision 2047成員，大筆捐款搞領袖培訓。2011年11月鍾普洋創立「香港服務領導與管理學院有限公司」(香港服務領導管理學院)，兩個月後2012年1月，鍾的香港服務領導管理學院與Vision 2047成員，馮氏集團主席馮國經宣布，以馮的「經綸慈善基金」撥款四千萬元，在香港八大學設立利豐服務領導計劃。翻查香港服務領導管理學院創立時的註冊資料，創辦成員Mr. Tom Osgood，Tom Osgood正是港美中心的Fulbright香港通識教育計劃的美國學者，參與大學三三四改制的通識教育課程設計。
學院的其他創辦人包括經綸慈善基金及利豐慈善基金有限公司董事KM Wong。馮氏家族的Fung(1937)Management Ltd.執董何伯全，亦現列席港美中心董事局。港美董事局的其他Vision 2047成員，包括Mark Michelson現任港美董事局副主席;港美董事局秘書Ada Tse，她任職的香港上海大酒店有限公司，其公司董事包立賢及高管Mulholland Lynne，亦是Vision 2047成員。
「傳爾布萊特香港通識教育計劃」雖已在2012年夏季做了總結，但港美中心現任行政總監夏龍透露港美會繼續帶來美國學者，延續各大學的通識課程，協助高級文憑及副學士的通識教育課程......
教育統籌局2004年發表「三三四」高中教育改革的諮詢文件，2012年正式推行大學三轉四年制，知情人士透露，華府利用這時機圖以美式教育體系取代香港傳統的教育，灌輸美國價值觀。因而美領館2006年主導，由港美中心執行「洗腦」教育。知情人士指出當時駐港美領事館在美國刊登廣告，招募Fulbright學者參加香港通識教育計劃，美學者來到香港有高薪，住宿免費，學者在美國的本科大學都獲資助，雙重着數，所以吸引大隊Fulbright學者來港。該知情人士指港商捐款連同港府配對基金，整個一手由華府策劃的通識教育項目獲9600萬港元撥款，每間大學獲配三名Fulbright學者。(3)
The above report is the rarely made genuine journalistic work in Hong Kong political news, but is also real journalism shown by Wen Wei Po. Unfortunately such an important report did not become a rebound and positive effect of the public at that time, why? The local blue-yellow political parties that control the masses of the working class did not react to it, and had acted indifferently because of its complex colour, but this ugly fact points out that it is a sign of violently ongoing tragic political process, and external forces enjoying the status of being part of establishment in Hong Kong. The ‘‘pro-establishment’’ chambers of commerce, ‘‘pro-establishment’’ associations, ‘‘pro-establishment’’ alliances, ‘‘pro-establishment’’ pressure groups of the Hong Kong ruling class, the internal and external forces of Hong Kong are all perfectly mixed together, so the foreign chamber of commerce and the Hong Kong chamber of commerce being naively defined into external and internal forces is inaccurate. In addition, Victor Fung this ‘‘pro-establishment’’, the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference(2014-2018?), Beijing International Entrepreneur Consultation Conference member, Nanjing City Government Economic Adviser, Peking University Honorary Trustee, Tsinghua University School of Economics and Management Advisory Committee member, Renmin University Honorary Professor, former deputy of China Center for International Economic Exchanges funded and promoted the US State Department educational agenda as a member of VISION2047 Foundation in Hong Kong.
Are there any other external and internal forces promoted and funded Hong Kong-America Center for the US-imperialist brainwashing liberal educational system in Hong Kong?
Dot Dot News (part of Wen Wei Po) reported on April 18, 2020,
由美國駐港領事館主導的中文大學港美中心，以學術包裝，實為政治滲透、反中思想的基地！美國駐港領事館公然資助港美中心，大搞所謂大學辯論及研討會，從中發現並培養親美反華新血。近年港美中心洗腦的對象，逐步由大學生，拉闊戰線向中小學生埋手，大舉推動免費網絡項目、網上遊戲，吸引學生參加，並同時先後多次舉辦「設計思維」工作坊，招攬國際學校及本地中學教師。記者發現，其中網絡學習項目的合作單位是德國「唐德拉阿登納基金會」，該機構其實是美國中央情報局（CIA）在歐洲的「左右手」，例如烏克蘭反政府組織就獲得該基金會支持。
此外，港美中心曾邀請立場反華的前CNN 記者Mike Chinoy擔任研討會主講者。居港的Mike曾在《南華早報》撰文講述香港暴亂爆發的原因，但文章立場偏頗，顛倒是非黑白。去年10月，他又撰文稱政府阻黃之鋒參選區議會，煽動學生上街。(4)
The Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, which can be described as the color revolution fund, is indeed just like this. The role of Germany and its political organizations in the US-backed Ukrainian Color Revolution 2013-14 (Ukrainian pro-EU demonstrations) was most prominent. Ye Xingping, a professor at Shenzhen University, summarized the following on February 26, 2014:
首先是非政府組織和智囊機構。在德國，幾乎所有重要的政黨，如社會民主黨、基督教民主聯盟、基督教社會聯盟、自由民主黨、左派黨和綠黨等，都有屬於自己的基金會。這些基金會的大部分資金來源於聯邦政府財政預算，主要用於增強國際上與德國的聯繫，促進民主以及市民社會的發展。其中，親基民聯盟的康拉德.阿登納基金會以及親社民黨的弗里德里希.艾伯特基金會是最大的兩個政治基金會。它們每年分別從聯邦政府獲得2.5億歐元的支持。德國的這些基金會在烏克蘭有諸多項目，康拉德.阿登納基金會是中間最活躍的。它與烏克蘭反對派，特別是克里琴科領導的烏克蘭改革民主聯盟保持密切的聯繫。後者的成員積極參與了去年11月以來發生在烏克蘭首都基輔等地的一系列事件。(5)
The Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung is also active in Hong Kong, but is less accused in the media.
The Hong Kong-America Centre incident confirmed that the local business community of internal and external forces blended into alliance of reactionaries for protecting vested interests and artistically blocked the influence and interventions of the central government on Hong Kong issues politically through foreign identity, the CPPCC identity, the ‘‘pro-establishment’’ identity, and the opposition identity to succeed in creating the brainwashing system for color revolutions. This is the political and technical style of the Hong Kong ruling class. Wen Wei Po later exposed the another masters of the Hong Kong-America Centre on April 18, 2020.
【文匯網訊】香港如同無掩雞籠，外力滲透無日無之。據《大公報》昨日(17日)報道，位於中文大學校園內的港美中心獲美國「磅水」布「網」，大搞政治活動。昨晚中文大學發出聲明與港美切斷26年關係，稱港美只是租戶，將會遷出。資料顯示，港美中心水喉充足，該組織每年獲美官方機構泵水至少三百至四百萬港元辦活動，這些金主輪番出手，包括美國中情局白手套組織福特基金會(Ford Foundation)、被中國制裁的美國國際事務民主研究所(NDI)、亞洲基金會(Asia Foundation)、反華親台的亨利魯斯基金會(Henry Luce Foundation)以及多個美國國會直資的基金會，他們全方位染指香港學術界。港美中心與亂港分子長期勾結，例如經常赴美膜拜的陳方安生就曾以港美中心為基地，培訓「佔中」學生。
港美中心與美國駐港領事館關係千絲萬縷。美國國務院資料顯示，美國駐港領事館在公共外交及東亞暨太平洋事務駐港辦事處的營運經費，最高一年多達二億港元撥款。這些錢不少都用於支持港美中心這樣的所謂「非政府組織」和學術機構，在美麗包裝下，完成一個又一個政治項目。
與美領館關係千絲萬縷
《大公報》去年12月揭發美國國際事務民主研究所(NDI)在2013年以港美中心名義，聯繫本港非營利組織，秘密舉辦內地婦女培訓營，慫慂學員學中東「顏色革命」推翻政權。有參加者最初以為是中大活動，提供上堂相片，才發現主導及資助項目的是策動「佔中」的NDI。
翻查港美中心由2002年至2018件共16年的公開資料，發現該煽動內地婦女顛覆政權的訓練營，由2013年起NDI連續五年泵水給港美，以「年輕婦女領袖倡議」名目入帳港美中心2013年及2014年的運作項目，兩年NDI合共撥款28萬。惟港美2013年的財務報表沒有列明「洗腦」營的委託機構是NDI，非常鬼祟。2015年至2016年該婦女「洗腦」營再獲NDI撥款127000多元;但2017年「年輕婦女領袖倡議」獲NDI泵水117000多元，卻沒有開支列項，非常離奇。
借學術之名煽學生搞事
2014年香港爆發「佔中」前夕，美國時任駐港領事夏千福(Clifford Hart)的前上司侯儒楷(Morton Holbrook)突然出任港美中心行政總監，其間邀請陳方安生、鄭宇碩等反對派授課的大學工作坊「Let's Talk：Youth Summit on Hong Kong Elections」，假借學術之名，煽惑學生勇於抗爭。......
港美中心另一緊密合作金主是親台反華的亨利魯斯基金會(The Henry Luce Foundation)。亨利魯斯基金會以智庫形式與台灣「外交部」的台灣民主基金會合辦交流團、領袖訓練營等，聲稱要「構建香港與台灣的密切關係」。基金創辦人亨利.魯賓遜.魯斯(Henry Robinson Luce)在中國內地出生，他是美國《時代》、《財富》創辦人。亨利魯斯基金會2006年資助華府重要智庫「美國外交關係會」(Council on Foreign Relations)，涉獵範疇包括宗教、文化及社會。基金會泵水港美中心亦是以宗教及社會等項目為名，滲透美式文化。
港美中心的另一水喉亞洲基金會(The Asia Foundation)由2011年至2018年泵水15萬多港元，資助港美中心活動。港美中心其他穩定的美官方金主包括美國國會轄下的「東西中心」(East-West Center)，以捐款或辦學習團為名撥款。由美駐港領事館主導及資助的「傅爾布萊特計劃」學術交流活動，則是港美中心主要的活動經費來源。(6)
The other masters of the Hong Kong-America Centre confirmed in the report are the Ford Foundation, the most notorious NGO in Hong Kong, the National Democratic Institute (NDI), the Asia Foundation, and The Henry Luce Foundation. The Henry Luce Foundation and the "East-West Center" (EWC) under the United States Congress are all non-governmental organizations, foundations, educational and research institutions that serve the US Color Revolutions around the world. On the same day, Ta Kung Pao reported,
《大公報》連續兩日踢爆位於中文大學校園內的香港美國中心操控大學通識課程。中文大學昨晚發聲明稱港美中心「從未屬於中大任何一個教研或行政單位，該中心只是租用中大校園作為辦公場所，而且也將於短期內搬離現址。」有學者表示，過去外界都稱「中大港美中心」，從未見中大出來澄清過，這次高調聲明，讓人感到校方有意與港美割席。
結束26年業主租戶關係
《大公報》翻查港美中心的註冊資料，94年註冊時，港美辦事處申報位於中文大學的田家炳樓，其後再遷址往現今的中文大學祟基學院利黃瑤碧樓。換言之，中文大學要與26年的老租戶分手。不過，中大稱之為「租戶」的港美中心，2003年至2004年的通訊報告，都是用中大網址，港美中心的現任行政總監夏龍由2008年11月16日上任至今是中文大學教育行政與政策客座副教授。港美舉辦的活動，在中大會議室及校舍內舉行，中大與港美中心之間，似乎比業主與租戶的關係要密切得多。(7)
However, the Hong Kong-America Centre will only move to other buildings within CUHK or elsewhere in Hong Kong to continue engaging in so-called "educational" activities. This is because the network of Hong Kong organisations which operating the Hong Kong-America Centre has not been affected, it's unharmed, and it still exists until today. Although the April news reports by the Ta Kung Pao and Wen Wei Po are still important in its political meaning, there is a certain social reason for not causing passionate reactions from the political parties as already mentioned above.
Its true main significance is not limited to the simple exposure of the background of the brainwashing liberal educational system in Hong Kong, as the editor(s) of the Ta Kung Wen Wei Po reported. On the contrary, it proves the fact that the business community of Hong Kong promotes US imperialist agendas and keeps dominating Hong Kong politics with external forces by infiltrating the CPPCC or NPC memberships and mainly the establishment, networks of ‘‘pro-establishment’’ pressure groups.
True masterminds are camouflaged in ‘‘pro-establishment’’ camp in order to protect their own vested interests from Beijing and mostly use the political advantages of being ‘‘pro-establishment’’ at the same time.
On May 11, 2020, Guan Ping, one of the commentators of Oriental Daily, noticed the report of Ta Kung Wen Wei Po,
該中心也曾舉辦佔中及其他街頭鬥爭活動的培訓，也曾經開辦專門學習外國如何組織發動顏色革命的培訓班。香港不少著名的反對派和抗爭運動頭臉人物，都曾是他們的導師及學員。這樣的一個與美國政府關係千絲萬縷，接受美國政府資助，實質上專門在香港及內地訓練從事反政府「社會運動」人才的機構，竟然可以平安無事，掛在中文大學廿六年，無人監察，不受干擾，不禁令人懷疑外國特殊機構是否可以在香港任意活動，不能動之分毫？
有趣的是，港美中心近日再被傳媒報道後，中大立即割席，表示港美中心只是大學的租戶，從未屬於中大任何一個教研或行政單位，該中心亦即將遷走。中大明顯是有意撇清與港美中心的關係。不過這個廿六年的「業主與租戶」關係如何建立和運作？中心前任及現任行政總監夏龍與侯儒楷均是中大榮譽學者，中心一向使用的網址及職員電郵，均以香港中文大學的域名「xxx@cuhk.edu.hk」，種種迹象都難免給人認為該中心是中大屬下機構或部門，中大校方未見解釋。據報道，該中心人員不時去內地大學作交流活動，表明身份是中大人員，對方接到名片也不會懷疑。看來中大需要公開澄清，需要怎樣的「業主與租戶」關係，中大才容許對方使用大學地址CUHK，名片上的電郵印上大學的域名「xxx@cuhk.edu.hk」，有權進入和使用中大的內聯網呢？
港美中心的背景，財政來源及主要管理人物的資料，並不是新消息，早在二○一四年，故友劉迺強兄已經有文章揭露過......(8)
It is true that Guan Ping supplemented the news by indicating a undeniable self-contradiction of Chinese University, but Guan Ping’s viewpoint and position are still perfectly confined in the so-called external forces and opposition ‘yellow’ camp, rather than covering the business community behind the color politics and even the role of the ‘‘pro-establishment’’ faction like the series of reports by Ta Kung Wen Wei Po revealed.
COMMENT
These news proved that the US imperialists have successfully penetrated the so-called ‘‘pro-establishment’’ organizations, even the establishment of Hong Kong to set up the notorious brainwashing liberal educational system in eight universities in Hong Kong, such as HKU; CUHK; Science and Technology; City; Baptist; Technology; Lingnan; EdUHK in order to push political agendas of both US and local ruling class.
To this end, the US State Department and its Consulate-General in Hong Kong and Macao selected scholars for brainwashing local students with the notorious Fulbright Program. The current Chief Executive, Carrie Lam, she has extra confidence in the ‘‘pro-establishment’’ chambers of commerce which composed of local and external capitalists who disclosed national secret via secret conversation with herself. One of masterminds of Hong Kong color revolutions, the ‘‘pro-establishment’’ interest group VISION2047 Foundation, and its member like the businessman CHUNG Po Yang (founder of DHL Hong Kong), not only funded the Hong Kong-America Centre for liberal education courses of eight universities, but also contributed to the establishment of the US-backed liberal education system with Hong Kong government through the establishment system. The result was "Fulbright Hong Kong General Education Program". In 2007, CHUNG Po Yang donated money to the Hong Kong-America Centre to launch the US-designed Hong Kong Liberal Education Program. CHUNG Po Yang and his Creative Initiatives Foundation helped promoting it. After that, the heads of eight universities took the all US Consulate General-recommended Fulbright Scholars.
In order to promote the above-mentioned plan, the members of the VISION2047 Foundation established the " Creative Initiatives Foundation " (members of the VISION2047 Foundation: CHUNG Po Yang; Godfery Scotchbrook, a famous American brand Del Monte food manufacturer; former financial affairs secretary Michael David Cartland; a close friend of Anson Maria Elizabeth Chan Fang On Sang, former Assistant Director of SWD Rachel Cartland).
The most important thing revealed on the Hong Kong-America Centre scandal is that after the establishment of "Hong Kong Institute Of Service Leadership & Management Limited" in Hong Kong by one of members of ‘‘pro-establishment’’ VISION2047 Foundation, co-founder of DHL International (Asia Pacific), and currently Chairman Emeritus of DHL Express (Hong Kong) Limited, CHUNG Po Yang in November 2011, in January 2012, CHUNG Po Yang’s Hong Kong Institute of Service Leadership and Management ltd. and other Vision 2047 member, Victor Fung, who is the chairman of the Fung Group, announced "Victor And William Fung Foundation" via which they funded $40 million to set up a Li & Fung Service Leader Plan at eight universities in Hong Kong in order to further promote US State Department-backed liberal studies.(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)
This means that this ‘‘pro-establishment’’ Victor Fung is not only an unofficial member of the Hong Kong Chief Executive’s Council of Advisers on Innovation and Strategic Development
Advisory Panel, an advisor to the Hong Kong Monetary Authority’s Infrastructure Financing Facilitation Office, an academician of Academy of Finance and the chairman of Civil Service Training Advisory Board, ex-member of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (-2018?), ‘‘pro-establishment’’, an American, a member of ‘‘pro-establishment’’ Vision 2047 Foundation, his Li & Fung Limited is the earliest member of ‘‘pro-establishment’’ the Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce (The Chamber's Oldest Members), the deputy chairman of the ‘‘pro-establishment’’ Our Hong Kong Foundation, co-sponsor of the newly established ‘‘pro-establishment’’ Hong Kong Coalition is also cooperating with US State Department on Hong Kong politics.
Finally, the one of US State Department’s foreign policy programs, "Fulbright Program" scholars who engaging in brainwashing local students were successfully trained and installed via the Hong Kong Institute Of Service Leadership & Management and the Hong Kong-America Centre. The American "Fulbright Program" scholars they trained were installed into the liberal education system of the eight universities as architects of liberal educational system itself to brainwash students, create colour revolutionary thugs, and cannon fodders for US and local ruling class political agenda. The end is to bring out colour revolutions like Occupy Central, Mongkok riot, and the still ongoing anti-extradition bill riots. The case of Victor Fung, an outstanding person in Hong Kong’s ruling capitalist class, best reflects the political characteristics of Hong Kong’s ruling class and the political ecology of the entire ruling class against central government. At this level, the class nature of the blue-yellow dichotomy is highlighted. The real political colour played by the ruling class in Hong Kong is that on one side it can automatically divide and manage the masses; on the other side it can automatically camouflage, guide and resist the political judgement about their own political nature by others including both citizens and the central government.
Surprisingly, a group of founders of the Hong Kong Institute of Service Leadership and Management are also members of Vision 2047 Foundation, such as Tom Osgood, an American scholar at the Fulbright Hong Kong General Education Program of the Hong Kong-America Center; and KM Wong, director of "Victor And William Fung Foundation" and Li & Fung Foundation Limited; CEO of Victor Fung's Fung (1937) Management Ltd. and the board of directors of the Hong Kong-America Centre, Ho, Patrick Pak Chuen; Mark Michelson, deputy chairman of the board of directors of the Hong Kong-America Centre; Ada Tse, secretary of the board of directors of the Hong Kong-America Centre; director of the Hong Kong and Shanghai Hotel Co., Ltd. Brandler, Andrew Clifford Winawer and executive Mulholland Lynne.
In addition, the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Ford Foundation, the most notorious NGO in Hong Kong, the National Democratic Institute (NDI), Asia Foundation, Henry Luce Foundation, and the "East-West Center" (EWC) which under the jurisdiction of the US Congress.
Mainlanders, they lack political maturity and certainly can’t imagine about this true aspect of Hong Kong local ruling class. They simply believe in the dualism between ‘‘pro-establishment’’ and the opposition, and customarily adopt the formal logic dichotomy of internal and external forces while reading Hong Kong news. However, as mentioned above, the so-called internal forces and external forces have long been integrated into one dialectically. The ruling class in Hong Kong itself is a fusion of internal and external forces historically, and internal forces are also external forces, so it is a pseudo-proposition to fight only external forces. It is also a fatal mistake to consider the opposition as the only internal force in Hong Kong to fight them.
The US imperialists successfully used the local two-faced compradors who compose the ruling class and so-called ‘‘pro-establishment’’ organizations to successfully establish the political networks. The term and concept of ‘‘pro-establishment’’ is a very suspicious and risky political term in the political chaos in Hong Kong. It is because the anti-China forces in Hong Kong have set up liberal education system for brainwashing students in Hong Kong by authority of being ‘‘pro-establishment’’, they originally infiltrated the so-called ‘‘pro-establishment’’ camp and its expanding organisational networks of agenda groups to stage and influence Hong Kong and mainland politics. To more thoroughly achieve this, the internal and external forces mainly infiltrate the mainland bureaucratic system by political deception and corruption. Hong Kong’s so-called ‘‘pro-establishment’’ organization network has mainly prepared Occupy Central, Mongkok riot and ongoing anti-Extradition bill color revolution by establishing the brainwashing liberal educational system designed by US State Department agents.
The following is an example of a specific organization network which behind Hong Kong color revolutions and political turmoil exposed by various news.
CPPCC-Victor Fung (‘‘pro-establishment’’; American; Fung Group; Li & Fung Limited; Beijing International Entrepreneur Consultation Conference member; Nanjing City Government Economic Adviser; Peking University Honorary Trustee; Tsinghua University School of Economics and Management Advisory Committee member; Renmin University Honorary Professor; former deputy of China Center for International Economic Exchanges) - Vision 2047 Foundation (co-founder of DHL International (Asia Pacific), and currently Chairman Emeritus of DHL Express (Hong Kong) Limited, CHUNG Po Yang; Tom Osgood, an American scholar at the Fulbright Hong Kong General Education Program of the Hong Kong-America Center; KM Wong, director of Victor And William Fung Foundation and Li & Fung Foundation Limited; the board of directors of the Hong Kong-America Centre, Ho, Patrick Pak Chuen; Mark Michelson, deputy chairman of the board of directors of the Hong Kong-America Centre; Ada Tse, secretary of the board of directors of the Hong Kong-America Centre; director of the Hong Kong and Shanghai Hotel Co., Ltd. Brandler, Andrew Clifford Winawer and executive Mulholland Lynne; ; Godfery Scotchbrook, a famous American brand Del Monte food manufacturer; former financial affairs secretary Michael David Cartland; a close friend of Anson Maria Elizabeth Chan Fang On Sang, former Assistant Director of SWD Rachel Cartland) – The Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce – Our Hong Kong Foundation – Hong Kong Coalition - The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (the Hong Kong Chief Executive’s Council of Advisers on Innovation and Strategic Development Advisory Panel; an advisor to the Hong Kong Monetary Authority’s Infrastructure Financing Facilitation Office; an academician of Academy of Finance and the chairman of Civil Service Training Advisory Board) - Consulate General of the United States in Hong Kong and Macau - Department's Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, United States Department of State - Fulbright Program - Creative Initiatives Foundation - Hong Kong Institute of Service Leadership and Management - Victor And William Fung Foundation - Li & Fung Foundation Limited - the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung - Ford Foundation - the National Democratic Institute (NDI) - Asia Foundation - Henry Luce Foundation - "East-West Center" (EWC) - eight universities in Hong Kong, such as HKU; CUHK; Science and Technology; City; Baptist; Technology; Lingnan; EdUHK– Liberal Education system of Hong Kong
NOTES
【大灣區】泛民議員積極參與考察 符合社會利益，擷取自https://www.hk01.com/01觀點/180372/大灣區-泛民議員積極參與考察-符合社會利益
【專欄】Vision2047遺漏出林鄭錄音，擷取自https://hd.stheadline.com/news/realtime/hk/1583248/即時-港聞-專欄-Vision2047遺漏出林鄭錄音
美操控港大學通識課洗腦煽暴，擷取自http://news.wenweipo.com/2020/04/16/IN2004160005.htm
「港美中心」招攬黃師滲學界 搞「網遊」洗學生腦，擷取自https://old.dotdotnews.com/2020/04/17/港聞/「港美中心」招攬黃師滲學界-搞「網遊」洗學生腦
乌克兰剧变背后的三只手，擷取自http://yexingpingblog.blog.sohu.com/301159964.html
港美中心四大金主現形，擷取自http://news.wenweipo.com/2020/04/18/IN2004180003.htm
中大漏夜發聲明 與港美中心割席，擷取自http://www.takungpao.com.hk/231106/2020/0418/438701.html
特別租戶？，擷取自https://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/commentary/20200511/bkn-20200511000431794-0511_00832_001.html
The Victor and William Fung Foundation，擷取自https://www.fungfoundation.org
利豐服務領導教育教授席，擷取自https://www.polyu.edu.hk/tc/giving/priorities/research-and-innovation/endowed-professorship-scheme/meet-the-top-minds/li--fung-endowed-professorship-in-service-leadership-education/
馮氏集團主席，擷取自https://www.funggroup.com/zh/story/victor_fung
中國人民政治協商會議第十二屆全國委員會委員名單，擷取自http://www.cppcc.gov.cn/zxww/2014/02/27/ARTI1393487184783942.shtml
MEMBER PROFILE，擷取自http://www.chamber.org.hk/en/membership/profile.aspx?issearch=yes&profile_letter=L
理事會，擷取自https://www.ourhkfoundation.org.hk/zh-hant/node/37
組織架構，擷取自https://www.hkcoalition.com/info/organization#co-sponsors
