Hong Kong Intelligence Report #9 Colour Revolution by ''Legitimate and Peaceful Demonstrations''
Updated: Jul 31, 2021
#HongKong #Intelligence #Report #香港情報分析 #OSINT
English Summary
1.''Pro-Beijing'' HKGCC which includes foreign interventionists, such as the Wall Street Journal Asia - according to sources (WaPo) - opportunistically, swiftly shifted its ‘pro-Beijing’
stance to ‘opposition’ on the Extradition Bill. It embodied true political nature of Hong Kong ruling class. Real estate agencies, developers and foreign interventionists united.
Foreign Interventionists in HKGCC (Its corporate media tend to cite HKGCC announcements)
2.‘Pro-China’Lawmaker Junius Ho was set up.The video itself is a POV of disinformer. Fake
news media tried to link entire ‘pro-China’ camp with planned riots. False Flag op.
3.Pat Heung District police officer Hanmin Lee’s
‘on duty’ footage on another ‘opposition’ demonstration on 7.16. 2019 was used to create
the fake news that links police with mafia. In 2014, mafia attacked opposition but the police proved that there was no link with pro-Beijing camp. On July 25 2019, police arrested one rioter who is responsible for both 7.14 Shatin riot at New Town Plaza and 7.21 destruction of the Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. The 23 year old 'black T shirt' rioter Liang has actual background of mafia. Unlike US anti-communist politician Marco Rubio's tweet, opposition used mafia to attack police at least in the two riots.
4.‘White T Shirts’ targeted passengers, not only limited to ‘Black T Shirts.’ ‘Opposition’
Lawmaker Lam Cheuk Ting strangely arrived there with his three hundreds ‘Black T Shirts’ to stage the ‘battle.’
5.TATP bombs owned and shared by ''pro-independence'' separatist student groups as ''indigenous terrorist group'' roles. TATP is frequently used by US-UK employed IS terrorists globally. It at least shows a linkage among them.
6. Some key industrial associations of Hong Kong film industry stated ''opposition'' requirements on the extradition bill issues. Such as Hong Kong Film Directors' Guild , Hong Kong Screenwriters' Guild and Hong Kong Film Arts Association. It proved that the film industry is infiltrated by the opposition camp and lost its neutralism as filmmakers. It is quite hypocritical while they highly depend on governmental subsidies from the pro-Beijing government and business in mainland China.
7. Chief of Junior Police Officers Association, Zhiwei Lin (林志偉) said that the opposition ordered its 'demonstrators' to storm 999 emergency line during July 21 Yuen Long riot. Police received about 24,000 fake emergency calls within three hours. It's a typical false flag operation to paint police as someone deliberately ignores emergency.
8. BREAKING:
2019 Yuen Long Violence was not done by villagers but it's done by the black shirted protesters themselves to false flag villagers who are indigenous people having special rights to keep their custom and lands. As you know Hong Kong ruling class is mainly represented by anti-communist real estate giants who are hostile to the indigenous people and China.
This false flag operations have various purposes. One is colour revolution, destabilisation, the second is upcoming elections in regional and governmental fields, the third one is to false flag police, indigenous people, pro-Beijing camp, and China.
The ''white T shirts'' who assaulted passengers and staged the ''battle'' with ''black T shirts'' were not real villagers, indigenous inhabitants of the New Territories (Hong Kong) from Yuen Long. They have special rights to own their fathers' lands and targeted by real estate agencies and developers. However ''white T shirts'' were proved to be ''black T shirts'' themselves by one of monitoring cameras. In which, ''black T shirts'' changed their costumes into ''white T shirts.'' It proved that 7.21 Yuen Long riot was a false flag operation. False flaggers are ''black T shirts'' themselves.
The first round of the riot occurred at 11:06 pm thus this footage does not contradict the time of the incident, moreover it indicates that they also prepared the white-shirted rioters in Hong Kong islands. In fact, they were cannon fodders to meet the arrive of police as attachments to Yuen Long. No contradiction with the timeline. It actually also indicated the re-staging of White-shirted false flag ops in North Point and Tsuen Wan on August 5 2019.
9. Detail: RT Facebook showed that some ethic minority guy who was wearing the blur T shirt attacked passengers with the white shirted rioters on July 21, 2019. This blue shirted riot was re-staged in Tsuen Wan on August 5 2019 again.
10.Another False Flag: On July 27, 2019, illegal protesters deliberately flagged wooden buts and Samurai blades in the unknown car parked near the target village Shui Pin Wai. However these strangely placed weapons were owned by the Sri Lanka guy not owned by any villagers.
11. Hong Kong MTR published report on the 7.21Yuen Long riot, it proved that someone had blocked the doors of rail train for 11min. before the rioters appeared. The rioters appeared at 11:06pm. MTR could not close doors to leave before the rioters appear.
Important
自從今年三月三十一日以來的美英歐澳日台等帝國主義支持的反中亂港暴動有一套模式，即先利用和平示威的框架取得警方不反對通知書之後，會再在其和平遊行集會的脈絡之下，當日使之演變成暴力衝擊以及非法佔據，如此警方處理得更為棘手，難以即時採取行動制止。所謂合法申請的和平遊行集會，只不過是合法化整個暴動和擾亂秩序的擋箭牌以及敘述。此種同時發動和平遊行以及暴力衝擊和佔據的模式是敵人帝國主義勢力最新的顏色革命的手段了。在合法和平集會遊行框架下發動的顏色革命，東歐顏色革命，尤其是捷克的 Velvet Revolution (1989) 開始用的連儂牆，以及透過網站和物質行動的抹殺政敵的人格破壞（Character assassination）的作戰都已充分顯示出目前的反對派發動的遊行示威的本質。 沒有領導核心是虛假的，一個無法逃脫的領導核心是向警方申請示威遊行的主辦單位，即至少48個反對派團體在內的反對派聯合體的民陣。
在合法和平集會遊行框架下發動的反中顏色革命：
2019年6月9日， 香港反對逃犯條例修訂草案遊行
2019年6月12日， 反對逃犯條例修訂草案佔領行動
2019年6月16日， 香港反對逃犯條例修訂草案遊行
2019年6月21日， 香港學界反對逃犯條例修訂草案圍堵行動
2019年6月26-27日， G20 Free Hong Kong集會
2019年7月1日， 七一遊行；佔據立法會
2019年7月7日， 香港反對逃犯條例修訂草案遊行
2019年7月14日， 香港反對逃犯條例修訂草案遊行
2019年7月21日， 香港反對逃犯條例修訂草案遊行
最有趣的現象是，在七月二十二日，包含公然助產暴動的外國勢力（大約四千多會員企業中確有美國跨國大企業，如華爾街日報）在內的香港總商會的最新的主張完全符合反對派的主張和立場。誠然，香港統治階級現形了。在穿著建制派制服的同時其自身支持去勢後的逃犯條例的立場轉變成反對派的立場了。 這也證明了支援建制派與反對派雙方的香港總商會的政治本質，就是香港統治階級的政治本性。這180度的政治立場的轉變並非投降，而是階級本質的顯現。完全合乎地產霸權在商界逃犯以及反中政治逃犯上的利益，即完全合乎反共的階級立場。 他們的政治立場在整個中國市場中的經濟利益與他們財產和社會權力的保護之間的緊張關係上左右變動，隨時擺動的，因此香港統治階級不僅需要建制與反對派的角色，也如此難免是機會主義。香港統治階級一方面透過建制派佔據議會與政府機構，另一方面利用反對派抵制中方及勞動群眾的影響力。這就是無法盲撐或盲反任何香港派別的客觀原因。 香港愛國的勞動者階級必須加以嚴厲批判和繼續關注。
若是真正為了解決香港社會議題，則應該會主張最嚴重的社會問題的解決，即降低樓價，多增建公樓，高度限制市場壟斷，標準工時制度，集體談判權，全民健保，國民年金制度等勞工以及社會福利制度的充實，並主要向長期反對那些民生措施的地產霸權及其商會抗議和訴求。不過，從地產霸權的媒體記者們扭曲逃犯條例一事，可看出的是議題扭曲和轉移。香港真正的民生議題都被漠視和轉移，沒有人抗議地產霸權此一民怨的主要來源了。誠然，逃犯條例的炒作成功地轉移民怨沸騰的真正來源了。 外國勢力和香港統治階級合作的成果就是這一逃犯條例風暴。
零售業受損？的確地產及其外國勢力企業的收益短期內降低些，但透過一系列暴動卻最大化他們長期的社會權力，話語權和政治利益。反對派暴動愈多，愈多的租戶更依存於地產霸權的慈悲，其短期經濟利益雖降低，但其長遠的經濟和社會政治利益如此極大化了。因此之故，最愚蠢的是盲撐和參加外國勢力和地產霸權支援和發動的反對派的假和平示威遊行及其暴動。顏色革命如此並非真草根運動。其實，由外國勢力與地產霸權的反共合作作戰。 這一政治利益層面才是比表面上的敵人的主張更為重要的，是核心部分。
Facts
A. 昨日上環反對逃犯條例訂示威演變成衝突，而元朗亦發生白衣人衝入港鐵車站及車廂打人，香港總商會發表聲明，譴責暴力事件，並提出四大要求，包括政策制定前擴大公眾諮詢、正式撤回逃犯條例修訂、修例事件上表現不稱職官員需要問責，以及成立調查委員會。
香港總商會聲明如下：
香港總商會強烈譴責昨天的暴力事件。面對社會持續分化，引起本地及國際社會關注香港對落實《基本法》和法治的承諾，本會促請各方合力儘快尋找方案，化解當前困局。解決逃犯條例爭議不果，再加上停滯不前的現狀，令公眾覺得訴求遭到漠視，激起民怨。
社會撕裂內訌，市民相互對立，令遊行示威活動漸趨對抗性。我們尊重和平示威人士在過去數周發聲表達關注，他們展現的公民素質和守法精神，實在難得。然而，少數激進人士於和平示威活動後作出暴力行為，令社會震驚。衝擊立法會、圍堵警察總部、沙田暴力衝突，以及昨晚的上環騷亂和中聯辦遭受惡意破壞，均屬不能容忍。而最新在元朗的駭人襲擊無辜市民事件，發展至部分人士罔顧法紀、訴諸暴力，更令香港市民深表震驚和深惡痛絕。
我們認為，要恢復社會安寧，並尋求解決問題根源的方法，政府及遊行示威人士可採取四項基本行動：
1.理解社會各界都心繫香港，致力守護這個世界級城市賴以成功的要素，以及提升生活質素，為下一代締造安居樂業的環境。政府應立即擴大不同層面的公眾諮詢範圍，並在政策制定過程中包容公眾意見，以化解社會矛盾；
2.認同雙方都要釋出誠意：政府應正式撤回逃犯條例；社會應譴責暴力行為，因為連串的暴力衝突已危害市民的日常生活和財產，並損害香港的國際形象。因此，我們必須盡力確保日後的遊行活動能夠和平進行；
3.政府必須明瞭，問責制之設立旨在加強問責，故在修例事件上表現不稱職的官員必須問責；
4.當局必須立刻成立調查委員會，獨立審視連串事件，從而查找導致當前社會緊張關係的根源及事態不斷