top of page

Hong Kong Intelligence Report #23 HK Oligopoly : Luo Huining and Deep-seated Contradictions

Updated: Jan 12

Open-source intelligence (OSINT)

Hong Kong Intelligence Report #23 HK Oligopoly : Luo Huining and Deep-seated Contradictions
PHOTO FILE: 什麼是香港的深層次矛盾? What is Hong Kong's deep-seated contradiction? ©Ryota Nakanishi


Hong Kong's intelligence agency is The Security Bureau but their intelligence ops did not work during the Hong Kong colour riots 2019. Hong Kong is full of disinformation ops, false flags, fake news, dogmas, discriminations, hate speeches, state propaganda and condemnations among different political camps but they lack deep analysis on their own political and economic issues. News reports are totally wasted. OSINT is more effective than exposing any secret documents traditionally due to internet.


The concept of deep-seated contradictions (three aspects; five points in total)

The term is one of important jargons of so called Socialism with Chinese Characteristics (1978-; SCC). It is actually based on dialectic materialism, thus it can be seen as a cell of its ideological system. There are five deep-seated contradictions in Hong Kong, covering three major areas of Hong Kong which are economy, politics and people's livelihood.

Wen Jiabao (1942-) said on March 14, 2010,

First, how to make use of the existing advantages and continue to maintain and develop Hong Kong's status as a financial center, shipping center and trade center;

Second, how to combine the characteristics of Hong Kong to develop advantageous industries, especially the service industry;

Third, it is necessary to take advantage of Hong Kong's proximity to strengthen its connection with the Pearl River Delta. The vast market in the Mainland and the rapid development of the Mainland economy are the potential for Hong Kong's future development;

Fourth, Hong Kong people must be tolerant of mutual aid, unite consensus, and be united to maintain Hong Kong's prosperity and stability. He said that Hong Kong will not only have great economic development in the future, but also develop democratic politics step by step in accordance with the provisions of the Basic Law;

Fifth, Wen Jiabao mentioned in particular: "There are two points that should not be ignored. One is to improve people's livelihood, and the other is to develop education."

It is only a matter of superstructures?

From the perspective of 2020, what Wen Jiabao suggested at the time was that Hong Kong should take existing advantages for its own industrial transformation, local economic absorption of economic development from economic and trade integration with the Mainland's Greater Bay Area, end of Hong Kong's internal political contradictions that damage the country and local interests, it also needs livelihood improvements, political reforms and education reforms.

As mentioned above, the concept of deep-seated contradictions covers both superstructures and economic foundations. However, Wen Jiabao did not mention who caused the deep-seated contradictions. Deep-seated contradictions are not only contradictions among the people, but also the most serious hostile contradictions in China.

The concept of deep-seated contradictions itself covers the superstructure and economic foundation,

therefore, the method of solving deep-seated contradictions essentially covers superstructure and economic foundation. There will be no proper way to solve only the problems of the political system, nor will there be a proper way to solve only the problems of the economic system.

Hong Kong's vested interests simply want to distort it into narratives and means to seize full governance. All they need to do is to achieve substantial Hong Kong independence with a dual universal suffrage.

From British colony under one country, two systems to Hong Kong, China under one country, two systems

Changing the electoral system is secondary and will not improve anything at all. What Hong Kong really needs is comprehensive decolonization and elimination of monopoly-capital. The deep-seated contradictions cannot be removed otherwise. At the same time, it is also necessary to promote industrial transformation with Chinese capital and restructure Hong Kong's ruling class. Finally, it will be changed from the British colony of Hong Kong under one country, two systems to Hong Kong, China under one country, two systems.

Who needs to prevent China from resolving the deep-seated contradictions of Hong Kong?

What impedes the transformation of the industry is the ruling class of Hong Kong as embodied by real estate hegemony. The ruling class Hong Kong society represented by real estate hegemony is monopoly capital dictatorship. What impedes the central government's effective governance of Hong Kong is the dictatorial Hong Kong ruling class represented by real estate hegemony, and what impedes the solution of people's livelihood issues (causing and maintaining the gap between rich and poor) is the dictatorial Hong Kong social ruling class represented by real estate hegemony. What obstructs patriotic education (love for colonialism) is the social dictatorship of the real estate developers.

The cooperation among compradors, external forces, real estate hegemony, and Hong Kong's colonial remnants is China's national security issue. The underworld of drug trafficking and violence organizations also belong to anti-China / anti-communist organisations. Anti-China chaos is powerful economic and social hegemonic investment and management project, which cannot be separated from the ruling class's planning, political and economic conspiracy for continuous profits. It is by no means a class cause that is in the interests of the grassroots proletariats.

An article published by Xinhua News Agency on September 4, 2019, entitled "Some Deep Roots behind the Storm in Hong Kong", one of the political representatives of the vested interests of the ruling class in Hong Kong and the founder of Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong, for the betterment of the black shirted opposition, Jasper Tsang Yok-sing, said This probably represents the views of the central government. Except for Hong Kong 01, the opposition media generally believe that the so-called deep-seated contradiction is the lack of political reform, that is the lack of so-called universal suffrage / dual universal suffrage. The representative of pro-Beijing camp in this view is Carrie Lam's election adviser and Aron Hari Harilela, chairman of the Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce. They believe that deep-seated contradictions are a matter of superstructure.

The article titled "Resolving Deep-seated Contradictions, Only Less Determined" published by the founder, Jasper Tsang Yok-sing, on January 6, 2020, is just a variant of oppositional argument, that is, he vaguely agrees that the deep-seated contradictions are belong to the economic and people's livelihood level, but the solution is political reform, the so-called true universal suffrage / dual universal suffrage. He particularly emphasized that Hong Kong does not have a ruling and opposition party system to form rotation system of government, and it has rigidified the long-term trend of the SAR government to serve vested interests exclusively. He attributed the problem to the superstructure, the method by which the government was created, not the oligopoly itself. This argument is clearly the demand and proposition of serving the vested interests represented by the seven-month black shirted rioters. We have seen these two kinds of claims that from the British Hong Kong remnants and vested interests in real estate hegemony.

Indeed, there is a problem with the superstructure. The administration and the judiciary are permeated by the evils of Britain Hong Kong remnants, and they are insane. The founder of the DAB, Jasper Tsang Yok-sing, is also a typical figure of the rightists of treacherous 'pro-Beijing' camp. Its nature and proposition are no different from those of the oppositions. The reform of the electoral system itself is not the same as the improvement of people's livelihood. For instance, after Taiwan first held the direct presidential election on March 23, 1996, from Li Tenghui, Chen Shuibian, Ma Yingjiu to Tsai Yingwen, they are the promoters of neoliberalism who sacrificed grassroots.

Despotism / Hegemony in Hong Kong

On the economic basis of monopoly capital, the consequences of changing the electoral system in Hong Kong will only be the dictatorship of monopoly capital.

It is more than the status quo that monopoly capital will completely control Hong Kong's governance and become the actual state of Hong Kong independence. Compradors of Hong Kong will have the opportunity to take Hong Kong from China. Do not forget that Hong Kong is still politically and economically in the world and mentality before Chinese liberation in 1949. Colonial morbidity permeates education and the media in particular. It is true that the problems of the electoral system itself are secondary and are not a priority issue except for oligopoly and compradors who want to seize full governance by creating political chaos.

In material terms, it is not the electoral system that troubles the working class in Hong Kong, but the gap between the rich and the poor caused by monopoly capital and the continuing deterioration of stalemate. However, the superstructure that accommodates and serves the monopoly capital is also part of the gap between the rich and the poor. The policy of high property prices, undeveloped brownfield sites, and the policy of tomorrow's Lantau for real estate hegemony only serves ruling class.

In addition to the insufficient land supply, the speed of building public houses is far behind. It will take years to build a public house after taking years for the land supply. It is unreasonable. It is impossible to respond to the unbalanced demands and declining purchasing power. The idea that Hong Kong merges with the mainland to increase lands is not mysterious, and the integration with the Greater Bay Area will bring about Hong Kong's land reliefs. However, none of them will involve the internal cause of solving the Hong Kong monopoly capital. Relief is not about cutting off the grass and roots.

Hong Kong's largest and most powerful anti-communist / anti-Chinese social forces are not individual opposition members, but only the monopoly capital of rich and hostile figurers.

The Xinhua News Agency wrote in its article "Some Deep Roots behind the Storm of Hong Kong Amendments":

"Behind the storm of ambiguous law amendment, there are some deep-seated social contradictions and problems in Hong Kong. These economic and livelihood contradictions have complex causes and have not been resolved for a long time. Become a huge social problem. "

In the eyes of many young people, the future lacks bright colors, saying that young people represent the future, but in the eyes of many Hong Kong young people, the future lacks bright colors.

The driver, who is 35 years old, loves motorcycles and runs high-power motorcycles in the countryside every weekend.

At this time, he is full of arrogance, but when it comes to the future, the mood swings. "In the future, will we have a future?" Without a house, crowded with his family, his girlfriend who had talked for many years could not get married, and the idea of ​​having children was long gone. Renting? The monthly rent of a 30-square-meter house is priced at HK $ 8,000 or 9,000, but Xiao-Kwong's monthly salary is only about 15,000 Hong Kong dollars. How can he rent it? As for buying a house with a down payment, don't even think about it. The speed at which you save money is definitely not faster than the rate of increase in house prices.

Comparing the increase in house prices and the increase in income in Hong Kong, it can be seen clearly: At present, the prices of different regions and housing types in Hong Kong vary, but most of them are more than 200,000 Hong Kong dollars per square meter. What about monthly income? A citizen told reporters: "Twenty years ago, university graduates took 10,000 Hong Kong dollars. In the past 20 years, they have risen to 12,000 and 13,000. How much have prices risen in the past 20 years? Counting inflation, universities Graduates are actually devalued. "

According to the data of the International Labour Organization in 2018, from 2008 to 2017, the real wage growth rate in the Mainland reached 8.2%, Macau 1.6%, and South Korea 1.2%. Taiwan ’s real wage growth was only 0.2%. Hong Kong even lags behind Taiwan, only 0.1%. From 2004 to 2018, Hong Kong house prices rose 4.4 times.

It is the rising housing prices and the stagnation of salary income that have led to a decline in the proportion of Hong Kong's owned homes. From 2003 to the present, the rate of home ownership in Hong Kong has fallen from 53% to 48.9%. Behind this data is that wealth is more concentrated, and many young people's own housing dreams are shattered.

The deep contradictions of politics, economy, and people ’s livelihood are trinity and not limited to only one of them.

The above clearly summarizes the hotbeds of riots that at which external forces and the opposition can exploit at any time. The deep-rooted contradictions in the field of people's livelihood are rising house prices and actually reducing salary incomes. This inevitably involves labor issues.

Insufficient labor rights in Hong Kong have contributed to low wages, low social benefits, high housing prices, and rising prices. At the same time, this is not only a monopoly capital issue of cross-industrial cartels in the economic field, but also a government, judicial and media issue that serves and shelters monopoly capital. The deep contradictions of politics, economy, and people's livelihood are all trinity. It is not limited to just one of these areas.

The commentator of the so-called ''pro-Beijing'' media in Hong Kong, such as Ta Kung Pao = Wen Wei Po, followed the above point. In fact, the riot is not for the purchase of a property, and the presence or absence of owned property is not a riot demand. Indeed, the riot demand itself is not a class claim of the working class, but it is for the seizure of political structure that the ruling class, who already have several mansions and loves flipping really want. The color revolution is for their economic hegemony, external forces politically use its internal contradictions in Hong Kong, anti-China / anti-communist ruling class mentality and their long-term strategy against China. The main axis of the problem lies in the internal cause, the internal deep-seated contradictions, that is, the vested interests that caused the deep-seated contradictions and the contradictions between China and Hong Kong. One-sided anti-imperialist narrative that only looks at external forces here is extremely stupid, and it instead shields internal forces behind the riots.

Wen Taomiao, a current affairs commentator of Ta Kung Pao, wrote an article which entitled "Where is the deep-seated contradictions in Hong Kong?" On October 25, 2019, ”Issued a consensus with Xinhua News Agency:

Increasing class contradictions and lower and lower class mobility are the essential contradictions in Hong Kong. "Has or does not have a house" is just one factor that has intensified the contradictions. In order to avoid hostility, some vested interests need to use the portrayal of the opposition, some media, and even the so-called "scholars" to divert people's attention to deceive the citizens who do not know the truth about the source of the problem. If this is not the case, why should associate professor Shen, who is in the upper class, jump out again and again and reiterate that the deep-seated contradictions in Hong Kong do not lie in the existence of an owned house?

Blind spots: Anti-imperialism and anti-real estate hegemony critics avoid criticism of capitalism itself

In class society, class contradictions are of course hostile contradictions. Wen Taomiao's argument also avoids corrupt bureaucrats who directly protect monopoly capital and serve monopoly capital. The problem of class mobility, that is, the rigidity of the gap between the rich and the poor, is a political and economic problem. That is also the result not a cause at all. The origin of evil is the monopoly capital of Hong Kong, capitalism itself, and its abnormal phenomena. Both the anti-imperialist and anti-real estate hegemony critics evade criticism of capitalism itself, and only criticize the special phenomenon of capitalism, that is, the cross-industrial monopoly capital of real estate hegemony. Even this is difficult to do at present.

How did the pro establishment and opposition media react to Luo Huining's appointment as the director of Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region?

If you want to know the thought of real estate hegemony, it is best to see how media that owned by the real estate hegemony or they run ads report news for the benefits of ruling class.

Yahoo Hong Kong, which is one of the US imperialist media, rightfully stands for real estate hegemony. Yahoo columnist Li Hongyan published a column on January 7, 2020.

In fact, Li Hongyan works for the opposition media The Stand News. The Stand News Introduction:

Director of Data Analysis and Strategy of ASIAM, stranger in the mirror, often presents himself as a wage earner in the "New News", "Wen Wei Po", "Ming Pao", "Hong Kong News" and "now Broadband TV", supplemented by as a columnist with a pseudonym, he occasionally works in literature, art, and drama. Interesting in seemingly complex and dull economics called Dismal Science. In the university years when he served as the chairman of the student council as a universally elected councillor, he understood the importance of the separation and balance of the four powers, legislation, administration, arbitration and the media.

Under the rule of Luo Huining (1954-), Shanxi Province diversified the income of Shanxi Province, breaking the habit of relying heavily on coal enterprises in the past. As of the first half of 2019, Shanxi's regional gross domestic product (GDP) reached 8357.65 billion yuan, an increase of 7.2% year-on-year, 0.9 % higher than the entire country's 6.1%, and far exceeded Shanxi's full-year and half-year forecasts. 6.1% and 6.7%. In particular, Shanxi no longer relies on coal production or processing. Shanxi's GDP in the first half of 2019 accounted for 54.4% of the tertiary industry, which is much higher than the 42.8% and 2.8% of the secondary and primary industries. The GDP of Shanxi in 2014, the proportion of the tertiary industry, the secondary industry and the primary industry were 44.5%, 49.32% and 6.18%, respectively.

If everyone applies his governance philosophy to Hong Kong, they will be able to detect his governance routine. Although I strongly disagree, and although I can give 100 examples to refute, some of the central opinions of the official media such as Xinhua News Agency, the Central Political and Law Commission, and CPPCC Vice Chairman Tung Chee-hwa blame almost all social problems on real estate and housing issues. Relevant voices believe that the underlying cause behind the "anti-amendment" storm is the housing problem. In particular, they criticize vested interest groups for making profits.

In fact, this so-called deep-seated contradiction against the real estate conglomerates also includes that they have long identified the tangible and intangible hands of the real estate conglomerates as early as infiltrating the political circle, trying to challenge the "one country, two systems" and the authoritarian governance of the Party Central Committee. In Shanxi, relying on coal mines to "threaten" the authority of central government, the problem of "coal monopoly" is a rich enemy that threatens the state and threatens the regime.

Similarly, many tycoons of Hong Kong in the central government's eyes rely on real estate to "threaten" the central government's hegemony, which is a rich enemy and a threat to the regime. The chief task of Luo Huining's Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is to reorganise the pro establishment camp to the team, and to restructure Hong Kong's habit of relying too heavily on real estate for both government and business. Do you understand?

Li Hongyan's argument is most suitable for HK01. He is extremely reluctant to identify monopoly capital as an internal cause of the hotbed of riots. Its subjectivity lies in the overly one-sided emphasis on the Chinese government's attribution of deep-seated contradictions to the issue of land and house issues. This will only help the anti-communist arguments in which CCP is just supposed to only fight against developers. Great HK01!

In fact, the concept of deep-seated contradictions of the Chinese government is not only critical for real estate hegemony, but also it covers the areas of culture, education, administrative, judicial compradors, the British Hong Kong remnants, external forces, anti-China Hong Kong media, educational institutions, anti-China / anti-communist cult and many more.

Li Hongyan’s interpretation of so-called ‘beating developers’ which Abraham also said are perfectly consistent. In fact, this argument also is to protect all the areas of social services for real estate hegemony which provided by the British Hong Kong remnants and penetration of outside forces. This is also one-sided argument in the anti-China / anti-communist political propaganda efforts.

The best voice of patriotism in Hong Kong is represented by Oriental Daily commentator Chen Wenhong. On January 7, 2020, Chen Wenhong wrote in the Oriental Daily News, entitled "Order in Danger":

From Luo Huining's past achievements, we can see his focus in Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. The first is to fight corruption and further clean up the scourge of Hong Kong caused by the great corruption in the Mainland over the past two decades. The establishment of anti-corruption patriotic camp in Hong Kong is just like how he handled corruption in Shanxi.

The second is to promote the economic transformation and upgrade of Hong Kong. The SAR Government does not do so, and it is still subject to vested interests. Luo Huining urge Chinese-funded institutions in Hong Kong to lead and demonstrate it, spur SAR government and Hong Kong businessmen to do it, and put pressure on the SAR government from the side.

The third is to reverse the mistakes of the United Front and the failure of public opinion ops. Expand the target of the United Front, establish effective and capable media and public opinion forces, support anti-corruption and economic transformation, so that it can be promoted, and in turn expand influence in public opinion and social support, rebuild the foundation, and strive for the middle class masses to turn.

The focus of these work is to address the current disadvantages. There has been a consensus for a long time, but the lack of implementation has led to errors so far, and it depends on whether Luo Huining can break through.

It is true that the CCP bureaucrats who stood between Hong Kong and the Central Government in the past safeguarded the vested interests of Hong Kong's anti-China and anti-Communist camp. The problems of the corrupt bureaucrats who cooperated with Hong Kong ’s British colonial remnants will not be solved simply by changing the director of the Liaison Office. The 22-years of united front op. failed, but the consequence of it is the black color revolution that began in 2019. Even, unlike the Russian media, the mainland official media and the localized so-called 'pro-establishment' / 'pro-Beijing' media are too bureaucratic, and they are not as good as the British, American mainstream media ’s net army, political propaganda technology, depth, charm, Internet hegemony, penetration and communication. The most stupid thing is that both the official and pro establishment media have been penetrated by anti-China and anti-Communist forces and have been unable to exert their full duties and necessary effects since 1997. The best example is Radio Television Hong Kong.

In fact, Luo Huining was not temporarily transferred or juts transferred, but it was strategically a planned route. Luo Huining is also the deputy director of the Finance and Economic Committee of the 13th National People's Congress and the director of Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region at the same time.

On November 30, 2019, at the age of retirement, Luo Huining resigned as the secretary of the Shanxi Provincial Party Committee.

On December 28, the 15th meeting of the Standing Committee of the 13th National People's Congress appointed Luo Huining as the Deputy Chairman of the Finance and Economic Committee of the 13th National People's Congress.

On January 4, 2020, Luo Huining served as the director of Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

In addition, Luo Huining personally has left the team that dealt with Shanxi coal hegemony, and the current team at Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is still the long-term inactive predecessor Wang Zhimin's team. Wang Zhimin, who has been dealing with vested interests in Hong Kong since 1992, he has not done anything at all in practice, so his removal was inevitable.

Changing the director of Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is still not enough to resolve the deep-seated contradictions in Hong Kong. A large number of central government’s task teams should also be dispatched to join Luo Huining's Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in order to break through the deadlock. However, the sanctions against the NED by the Office of the Commissioner of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs have proved the plight of the central agency operating teams in Hong Kong are in isolation, that is, the SAR government has not assisted the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on sanctioning NED. Ta Kung Pao reports on December 16, 2019:

FILE PHOTO: December 10 NDI Meeting with the opposition leaders.  Image: Ta Kung Pao
FILE PHOTO: December 10 NDI Meeting with the opposition leaders. Image: Ta Kung Pao

On the evening of December 10, two days after the rioters held the World Human Rights Day march, the reporter from Ta Kung Pao found that Adam Nelson, senior project manager of NDI Asia, appeared in Hong Kong to further implement NDI president Derek Mitchell's instructions. Adam Nelson joined Amnesty International's Asian Initiatives and Government Relations Commissioner, DO Yun Kim, at the secret meeting of Mandarin Oriental Hotel in Central with Martin Lee, Lee Cheuk-yan, Margaret Ng Ngoi-yee, former member of " Article 45 Concern Group" ( now Civic Party), Michael C. Davis, former professor of the University of Hong Kong Law School, director of the Asian Law Research Center of Georgetown University, and former East Asian project of Soros' subversion tool "Open Society Fund" Director Tom Kellogg, this person has repeatedly co-organized activities with the law school of the University of Hong Kong, where Benny Tai Yiu-ting works, on the illegal "Occupy Central.’’

Seven people sat in the more concealed seats of the Mandarin Oriental Hotel restaurant, with screens covering the sides, discussing "Hong Kong Development". When the three opposition members speak, DO Yun Kim and Tom Kellogg specially took out pen and paper records. Lee Cheuk-yan, who has just returned from Australia ‘s "lobbying trip", mentioned that the "movement" should become "more popular". Pan-violent faction "continues to take the international route" approached by Adam Nelson and his party "certainly." Michael C. Davis sat face-to-face with Martin Lee, and moved fingers and talked loudly during his speech. His voice was so loud that he was heard outside several dining tables. He mentioned that "this is not the time to change the direction of street movement." Integration of peaceful and VALIANT protests should be the direction of necessary adjustment after the local election. Adam Nelson often typed on his mobile phone and was once out of seat.

What is interesting above is the meeting location, and also the Mandarin Oriental Hotel owned by Jardine Matheson, which was specifically targeted and destroyed by the thugs. The above facts confirm that the United States is not afraid of sanctions by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Hong Kong, and the SAR government has not implemented sanctions by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs since early December 2019. Practice has already proved that it is not enough to just change the director of Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region should play a more active governmental role to solve the deadlock. Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region should function as the central government in Hong Kong, not just a platform for voice transmission. For citizens who love the country and Hong Kong, the reality is not optimistic at all. Hong Kong's theory on the issue is sufficient. The real problem is still a lack of action.

The black riots of 2020 will last until September's legislative elections.


Corrupted Intelligence: SAR intelligence agency's Avoidance of International Conflicts

The intelligence analysis of the ineffective intelligence unit of Security Bureau and its director John Lee Ka-chiu are far behind the average citizens knowledge. Seven months after the riots, it was on January 8, 2020 that Security Bureau and its director John Lee Ka-chiu publicly admitted the protesters in black might be trained by foreign forces. As the world people already saw, foreign forces did get involved in the riots, and everyone had known about them half a year ago, furthermore it was an open secret for decades.

The black riots of 2020 will only last until this September's legislative elections. Don't forget that the black riots are also election operations. The recent elections successfully won by the black riots were the 11.24 district elections and the 1.11 Taiwan presidential and legislative elections.

Why is there no action against Hong Kong’s reactionaries by the Central Government and its bureaucracy? The Chinese Communist Party must review the united front mistakes, and the membership of the CPPCC has been reduced to the protective umbrella of anti-Communist vested interests in HK

As far as Hong Kong policy is concerned, the most fatal thing that binds the Chinese government is actually the 124 ruling class members conferred by the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference as a united front means, that is, 124 "invited Hong Kong people" have basically used the status of being the CPPCC members to consolidate vested interests, as the result, so called ‘pro-Beijing’ camp must not criticize it. Created immunity for reactionaries.

Those including the real estate hegemony Cheung Kong (Holdings) Limited and Henderson Land Development Company Limited are exempt from the criticism of the realist ‘pro-Beijing’ camp and its blind supporters, and their attitudes and policies toward social issues have been so distorted for 22 years.

The so-called ‘pro-Beijing’ camp in Hong Kong has become a group of vested interests who are pausing like ‘patriotic and loving Hong Kong’ citizens. The central government’s fatal mistake is that for administrative convenience, it considers only 124 united front partners are valued, while the population of Hong Kong workers who have truly loved the country is about 3,956,000. This eventually caused some dissatisfied people to gradually lead to the opposition camp. This situation will only be bad for China. The wrong United Front object has created an umbrella for anti-China and anti-Communist forces politically in HK.


The best opportunity to resolve deep-seated contradictions will be buried in the hands of real estate hegemonic representatives Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor

and Law Chi-kwong

Policy Innovation and Coordination Office and Independent Review Committee

Chen Wenhong, the best senior commentator of the Oriental Daily News, pointed out that because the central government pressured SAR government, Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor had to set up the independent review committee however it is in the hands of Law Chi-kwong, a representative of real estate hegemony.

Chen Wenhong wrote on January 11, 2020, entitled "Carrie Lam's Head":

The deep-seated contradictions in Hong Kong society have been raised for a decade or two. Maybe they have not been discussed in depth. A general consensus has already been reached. The work of the independent review committee is to further in-depth summary, rather than simply to set the topics and scope of the investigation. As long as the government's policy innovation and co-ordination office is willing to organize, the list of issues and scope can be sorted out.

In fact, the Policy Innovation and Co-ordination Office is calling for a bid for related research, which may be limited to funding. The results of the research will be inadequate, but it is sufficient to assist the work of the Independent Review Committee. Law Chi-kwong is now chairing the committee, which may represent a special factor for Law Chi-kwong’s being a credible brain of Carrie Lam. It is obvious that Carrie Lam personally ordered Law Chi-kwong to preside over such a major political initiative as trying to safeguard Carrie Lam’s opinions and interests.

As a social worker scholar, Law once conducted a review for the Urban Renewal Authority. As a result, the Authority was transformed into a "real estate developer". I believe that his position will be similar to the interests of real estate developers. Let him co-ordinate the Independent Review Committee and organize scholars for research. The principle of choice will not be independence and impartiality, but rather pre-established considerations and principles.

Carrie Lam co-ordinated the Independent Review Committee with Law, overhead the Policy Innovation and Coordination Office and the Commerce and Economic Development Bureau. Although the Labor and Welfare Bureau also involves deep-seated contradictions, there is always a policy treatment only after the event. One does not involve research, the other does not have economic and social forward-looking considerations and perspectives, and is not a suitable candidate.

Former opposition Democrat Lawmaker Law Chi-kwong is still an opposition, even an extremely outrageous neo-liberal, not only unsuitable for the Independent Review Committee, but also for the candidate for the Commissioner for Labour. People still remember Law Chi-kwong’s scandal. Apple Daily reported on April 12, 2019 that the Secretary for Labour and Welfare, Law Chi-kwong, said that if a person has a 120-year life expectancy and 60 years old is middle-aged, it will cause negative reactions in society. How can Law Chi-kwong, who has no understanding of the class and class interests of the 3,956,000 workers, reviewing the deep-seated contradictions independently for the grassroots? The survey and conclusions are merely perfunctory, as well as sheltering monopoly capital and external forces.

Four "further steps"?

On January 9, 2020, Luo Huining met with Carrie Lam and published four "further steps". This new slogan lists the empty slogans that have been abused in the past seven months. These requirements, coupled with "further" requirements, are also extremely tedious and still lack specific policies and actions even specific research of any specific situations. The four "further steps" that basically follow the five-point concept of deep-seated contradictions are as follows:

Further implement the "One Country, Two Systems" policy to maintain Hong Kong's long-term prosperity and stability.

Further promote the work of stopping riots, restoring order, and maintaining the rule of law in Hong Kong.

Further promote economic development, improve people's livelihood, and promote the construction of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area.

Further strengthen communication and cooperation to better perform their duties and perform their duties together to get things done in Hong Kong.

The author fully agrees with the criticism of Liu Fufeng, an excellent commentator of the Oriental Daily News, that solving deep-seated contradictions should be on deep-level and even institutional level of the system. Liu Fufeng wrote in a review entitled "Deep Stopping Violence Can Be Effective":

Judging from the actual situation, it is still the first priority to stop violence and control the order, this premise is the foundation. To stop the riots, we cannot be satisfied with the ebb and cessation of the riots. We cannot be satisfied with how many rioters have been arrested. We must not be satisfied with the recovery of ‘social order.’ Instead, we must cut the roots off, eliminate the evils, get rid of the black hands, and destroy the blacks. Violent underground organizations, punishing traitors, destroying propaganda machines and internet podiums that create rumours and inciting riots, cutting their treasonous channels and other channels off.

Without such deep-level riot control, it is impossible to implement the "one country, two systems", maintain Hong Kong's long-term prosperity and stability, develop the economy, improve people's livelihood, and promote the construction of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. "It is better to perform our duties and fulfil our responsibilities and work together to get things done in Hong Kong."

Ebb and Flow of Endless Political Game of Ruling Class between Mainland China and HK

It is true that the colonial Hong Kong and British remnants of the SAR only want to be perfunctory against the requirements of Chinese Communist Party as usual, and the Chinese Communist Party organisations have also been tied up by the vested interests of the CPPCC members of the United Front. After the victory of the mobs, there will only be a temporary riot ebb. This will not eliminate the root cause of the riot and the social mechanism that can initiate a color revolution at any time. The SAR government only wants to achieve surfaced riot cessation by passive means such as surrender and concession. And it will never involve structural improvements, it won’t touch vested interests at all.

In the end everything will flow in form and endless delay as usual. Only huge losses will be left at the grassroots level. After the black riots, Hong Kong’s patriotic and loving Hong Kong citizens are even more distrustful of the establishment, and the SAR government and the central government. We just take it for granted. Both ''socialism'' and capitalism are in decay.


After the thorough analysis of the Hong Kong Protests 2019, I got a conclusion below: It’s about social hegemony of colonial interests thus their FREEDOM FIGHTERS, HONG KONGERS are destroying mainland China related capital and facilities at the cost of the class interests of the working class and students. Maybe you wonder why they target Metro? Because Metro is a land owner, they want lands as many as possible after Metro gets forced to sell more lands cheaply. It actually happened on December 16, 2019. A bid for Saleable Area phase 12 at LOHAS PARK. Those protests are actual political and economic tactics to get rid of Mainland China’s legitimacy and competitiveness in Hong Kong.



Hong Kong Intelligence Report #23 HK Oligopoly : Luo Huining and Deep-seated Contradictions


Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.


bottom of page